2014
DOI: 10.1002/jgt.21833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Vertex Degree Threshold for ‐tiling*

Abstract: Abstract. We prove that the vertex degree threshold for tiling C 3 4 (the 3-uniform hypergraph with four vertices and two triples) in a 3-uniform hypergraph on n ∈ 4N vertices is otherwise. This result is best possible, and is one of the first results on vertex degree conditions for hypergraph tiling.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact value of t 2 (n, Y 3,2 ) was determined recently by Czygrinow, DeBiasio, and Nagle [2]. We [10] determined t 1 (n, Y 3,2 ) very recently. The key lemma in our proof, Lemma 2.8, shows that every k-graph H on n vertices with δ k−1 (H) ≥ ( 1 2k−b − o(1))n either contains an almost perfect Y k,b -tiling or is in the extremal case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The exact value of t 2 (n, Y 3,2 ) was determined recently by Czygrinow, DeBiasio, and Nagle [2]. We [10] determined t 1 (n, Y 3,2 ) very recently. The key lemma in our proof, Lemma 2.8, shows that every k-graph H on n vertices with δ k−1 (H) ≥ ( 1 2k−b − o(1))n either contains an almost perfect Y k,b -tiling or is in the extremal case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In this paper, we investigate the minimum vertex degree conditions for tiling complete 3-partite 3-graphs K. Our result is best possible, up to the error term γn 2 . We remark that in some cases (e.g., K = K 1,1,t for t ≥ 2) it seems possible to remove the error term and obtain exact results -this was done for K 1,1,2 in [4,15]. In general, in order to obtain an exact result, we need to have a stability version of the almost tiling lemma and a stability version of the absorbing lemma, together with an analysis of the 3-graphs that look like extremal examples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For perfect Hpackings other than a perfect matching, results are much more sparse. Lo and Markström [27] found the asymptotic values of δ 1 (K 3 3 (m), n) and δ 1 (K 4 4 (m), n), where δ 1 (H, n) denotes the smallest integer δ such that any k-graph G on n vertices with deg G ({x}) ≥ δ for any x ∈ V (G) contains a perfect H-packing, and K r r (m) denotes the complete r-partite r-graph (defined PACKING k-PARTITE k-UNIFORM HYPERGRAPHS 3 below) whose vertex classes each have size m. More recently, Han and Zhao [12] gave the exact value of δ 1 (K 3 4 −2e, n) for large n, whilst Lenz and Mubayi [24] proved that for any linear k-graph F (meaning that any two edges of F intersect in at most one vertex), any sufficiently large 'quasirandom' k-graph with linear density contains a perfect F -packing. However, in general our knowledge of conditions which guarantee a perfect H-packing in a k-graph G remains very limited.…”
Section: Perfect Packings In Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%