2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2007.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining association rules from imprecise ordinal data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, from the algorithm's point of view, these two categories can be merged into a single category. Finally, the third category extends the algorithms so that they can find association rules from quantitative data, such as salary, height, humidity, and so on (Chen & Weng, 2008). According to Agrawal & Sirkant (1994) ∪ .…”
Section: Data Mining Association Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, from the algorithm's point of view, these two categories can be merged into a single category. Finally, the third category extends the algorithms so that they can find association rules from quantitative data, such as salary, height, humidity, and so on (Chen & Weng, 2008). According to Agrawal & Sirkant (1994) ∪ .…”
Section: Data Mining Association Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, from the algorithm's point of view, these two categories can be merged into a single category. Finally, the third category extends the algorithms so that they can find association rules from quantitative data, such as salary, height, humidity, and so on (Chen & Weng, 2008). According to Agrawal & Sirkant (1994), given an item set…”
Section: Data Mining Association Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the importance of data mining is becoming increasingly obvious. Many data mining techniques have also been presented in various applications, such as association rule mining, sequential pattern mining, classification, clustering, and other statistical methods (Chen & Weng, 2008). Association rule mining is a widely recognized data mining method that determines consumer purchasing patterns in transaction databases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at Table 1, the pattern {T reatment1 = Average 1 } is a fraction of the opinion expressed by the practitioner P 1 and therefore the extracted information is not complete. Unfortunately, this type of output is generated by uncertain mining approaches [7,8,9]. An opinion pattern would be T reatment 1 = Bad 0.3 Average 0.7 and is considered as frequent since it does not contradict with the opinion of P 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%