2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-012-0526-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining frequent conjunctive queries in relational databases through dependency discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large research body has been devoted to mining frequent queries from relational databases [17,18,19]. Even though a pattern set with a given schema can be selected by means of group-by query, analysts must (i) know all the attribute combinations in advance and (ii) execute a separate group-by query for each schema, which also enforces support, coverage or cardinality constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large research body has been devoted to mining frequent queries from relational databases [17,18,19]. Even though a pattern set with a given schema can be selected by means of group-by query, analysts must (i) know all the attribute combinations in advance and (ii) execute a separate group-by query for each schema, which also enforces support, coverage or cardinality constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The support of each candidate k-itemset is computed by performing a dataset scan and the infrequent itemsets are discarded (lines [11][12][13][14]. Furthermore, the pattern sets satisfying the global constraint C, i.e., the coverage or the cardinality constraint, are selected (lines [15][16][17][18]. Since distinct itemsets with the same schema cannot cover the same record, the coverage of a pattern set can be straightforwardly computed by summing the support values of its itemsets.…”
Section: Algorithm 1 the Copas Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%