1995
DOI: 10.1080/03081089508818403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minor summation formula of pfaffians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before we proceed to the proof of Theorem 2.1, we cite a lemma from [8]. The proof is not difficult, but we omit the proof and the reader can consult [8], Section 4, Lemma 7.…”
Section: Minor Summation Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Before we proceed to the proof of Theorem 2.1, we cite a lemma from [8]. The proof is not difficult, but we omit the proof and the reader can consult [8], Section 4, Lemma 7.…”
Section: Minor Summation Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…denote the set of all r-element subsets of S. We cite a theorem from [8] which we call a minor summation formula: Theorem 2.2. Let n and N be non-negative integers such that 2n ≤ N .…”
Section: Minor Summation Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since in [4] the skew Capelli elements are introduced through their eigenvalues in terms of the irreducible summands of the decomposition of the ring of polynomials on the space of skew-symmetric matrices, it is difficult to obtain explicit formulae directly from the definition. The main purpose of the present paper is to provide such an explicit Capelli identity by using the minor summation formula of Pfaffians established in [5]. In particular, we give an explicit formula for the skew Capelli element, which in fact belongs to the centre ZU(gl N ) of the universal enveloping algebra U(gl N ), in terms of the trace of powers of a matrix E = E N .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find the skew Capelli elements, we look at the following identity as our starting point (see p. 296, Remark 2 in [5]):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%