MIPV6 Protocols: A Survey and Comparative Analysis

Vasu, Kantubukta; Mahapatra, Santanu; Kumar, C. S.

doi:10.5121/csit.2012.2408

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The researchers compared the Host-Based mobility management protocols and Network-Based mobility management protocols to identify the optimized routing protocol for mobile network. Vasu et al [23], had investigated a survey and comparative analysis for MIPv6 protocols. The researchers had performed various mobility management protocols in terms of handover latency and the number of hops is needed to evaluate these protocols.…”

Section: Reliable Mobility Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Private and Mobile inter-network routing for Wireless Sensor Networks and Internet of Things

Saberi¹

2022

Int. j. commun. netw. inf. secur.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last few years, using the Internet of Things has been expanded in many areas, such as environmental monitoring, industries, and smart home. Since the Internet of Things has a direct relation to human life, its security is of paramount importance. Therefore, the communication between the nodes should be secured and the valuable private information should be kept private so that the attacker cannot detect the network structure. This article provides a protocol that can handle routing privately. To do this, we use the data structure called Spatial Bloom Filter (SBF). In addition, the proposed protocol uses random identifiers instead of IP addresses, so that an attacker cannot collect network structure information and location of nodes from IP addresses. Using a homomorphic encryption scheme, the protocol prevent attackers from retrieving valuable network information, if they can infiltrate to one or more network nodes. Also, since almost all nodes in the internet of things are mobile, the structure of networks and subnets is constantly changing. The proposed protocol has the ability to manage to route in networks with a dynamic structure.

show abstract

Section: Reliable Mobility Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Private and Mobile inter-network routing for Wireless Sensor Networks and Internet of Things

Saberi¹

2022

Int. j. commun. netw. inf. secur.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…K Vasu, et. al [7], had investigated "MIPv6 Protocols: A Survey And Comparative Analysis". The researchers had performed various mobility management protocols in terms of handover latency and the number of hops is needed to evaluate these protocols.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consolidation of Host-Based Mobility Management Protocols with Wireless Mesh Network

Hoh¹,

Ong²,

Ahmad³

et al. 2017

Proceedings of the First EAI International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of mobile devices increases exponentially and it becomes the trends and needs of human. With the increasing demands for new data and real-time services, there is a need of wireless Internet networks that can support different traffic characteristics and different Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees. All these Internet network mobile device services are supported by the mobility management protocols and its affects the QoS of the Internet. Having known the importance of mobility management protocol, we consolidate MIPv6, HMIPv6, FMIPv6 and FHMIPv6 with Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) into one environment. We identify, analyze, and compare the performance of Host-Based mobility management protocols integrate with WMN in terms of latency, throughput and packet loss ratio. At the end of this research, it is proven that the design and development of FHMIPv6 with WMN performs better as compared to the others Mobile Internet Protocols over the Internet using NS-2 Network Simulation software.

show abstract

“…IETF has proposed standards for handoff process called Mobile IP (MIP) [8], [14]. For the purposes of implementing IPv6, IETF introduced some protocols such as Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6), Fasthandover MIPv6 (FMIPv6), Hierarchical MIPv6 (HMIPv6) and the latest is Proxy MIPv6 (PMIPv6) ( [1], [2], [4], [5], [6], [7], [12], [15], [19], [23], [24], [27]). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of detection device method on seamless proxy mobile internet protocol version 6 (SPMIPv6)

Wiharti

Rimra

Vitria

et al. 2015

2015 2nd International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile IP (MIP) is a standard issued by the IETF to address the disconnection of communication between the mobile devices (MD) and the attachment points in the telecommunication networks such as mobile networks and wireless networks when the devices change their location. When users move, the connection of MD to an access point (AP) is disconnected before it is communicated to a new AP. Protocols for MIP have been developed such as MIPv6, FMIPv6, HMIPv6 and PMIPv6 as the latest protocol. In order to have seamless communication on PMIPv6, the proposed approach of using Detection Device (DD) and Synchronized Packet Simulcast (SPS).SPS is aimed to reduce packet loss on PMIPv6 and DD is used to shorten the time required by MD so as to find nMAG to be contacted. Hence, the MD's connection will not be terminated by the communication of LMA.

show abstract

MIPV6 Protocols: A Survey and Comparative Analysis

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Cited by 6 publications

References 18 publications

Private and Mobile inter-network routing for Wireless Sensor Networks and Internet of Things

Private and Mobile inter-network routing for Wireless Sensor Networks and Internet of Things

Consolidation of Host-Based Mobility Management Protocols with Wireless Mesh Network

Implementation of detection device method on seamless proxy mobile internet protocol version 6 (SPMIPv6)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About