2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIRU-VNTR typing adds discriminatory value to groups of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium caprae strains defined by spoligotyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
46
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
46
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in agreement with previously published data showing that MIRU locus 26 is the most discriminatory locus for M. bovis, while loci 2, 4,10,20,23,24,27,31,39 and 40 are less or not at all discriminatory (Roring et al 2004). Contrary to these findings and other reports, some studies observed little allelic diversity for MIRU locus 16 (Roring et al 2004, Boniotti et al 2009, Duarte et al 2010). In addition, Hilty et al (2005) found a moderate level of allelic polymorphism for MIRU loci 4 and 27 and Allix et al (2006) reported high allelic diversity for MIRU loci 24 and 27.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is in agreement with previously published data showing that MIRU locus 26 is the most discriminatory locus for M. bovis, while loci 2, 4,10,20,23,24,27,31,39 and 40 are less or not at all discriminatory (Roring et al 2004). Contrary to these findings and other reports, some studies observed little allelic diversity for MIRU locus 16 (Roring et al 2004, Boniotti et al 2009, Duarte et al 2010). In addition, Hilty et al (2005) found a moderate level of allelic polymorphism for MIRU loci 4 and 27 and Allix et al (2006) reported high allelic diversity for MIRU loci 24 and 27.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…In the present study, we applied two molecular fingerprinting methods, spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing, to assess the genotypic diversity of Brazilian strains of M. bovis and to better understand bovine TB transmission in Brazil. Previous studies already demonstrated the efficiency of both methods in several countries (Sola et al 2003, Boniotti et al 2009, Duarte et al 2010. In Brazil, however, IS6110-RFLP, polymorphic guanine-cytosine-rich sequence-RFLP and spoligotyping, but not MIRU-VNTR typing, have been reported as typing methods for M. bovis isolates (Zanini et al 2001, Rodriguez et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no variation at loci ETR-D and QUB11b. Locus QUB3232 was the most discriminatory locus, followed by ETR-B, which is consistent with other studies (1,7,9). Loci QUB3232 and QUB11a have been previously found to have a higher mutation rate regarding allelic diversity in M. tuberculosis and were therefore considered hypervariable (27); nevertheless, their use remains controversial as they may contribute to improved discrimination in determined settings (15).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Strains with the same spoligotype are assumed to be individuals recently derived by clonal replication from a single ancestral cell; therefore, epidemiological related strains should have higher genetic similarity than those no related (Rodríguez-Campos et al, 2011;Milián et al, 2016). Furthermore, spoligotyping has been used successfully in epidemiological studies in many countries (Gibson et al, 2004;Parra et al, 2005;Duarte et al, 2010;Rodríguez et al, 2010;Skuce et al, 2010;Ruettger et al, 2012;Mwakapuja et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%