2009
DOI: 10.1007/s13149-009-0002-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mise en place de la culture in vitro de Mycobacterium ulcerans à partir d’échantillons cliniques versus recherche de BAAR et détection du génome bactérien à Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire

Abstract: Mycobacterium ulcerans infections are a public health problem in Céte d'Ivoire. The etiological diagnosis of this disease made by culture remains a big concern due to the slowness and difficulties encountered. This detection by culture of M. ulcerans represents a big interest as it allows obtaining the circulating strains for research. The purpose of this study was to determine on a routine basis in a poorly equipped laboratory, in vitro culture of M. ulcerans from exudates of skin ulcerations and from biopsy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate observed in this study is similar to the WHO recommendation. However in other studies some authors found a positivity rate high [18,19] or low to compare to our rate [9,20]. The different of positivity rate observed could be explained by the number of samples cultured but especially by the decontamination method.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rate observed in this study is similar to the WHO recommendation. However in other studies some authors found a positivity rate high [18,19] or low to compare to our rate [9,20]. The different of positivity rate observed could be explained by the number of samples cultured but especially by the decontamination method.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…There is no difference between the positivity rate of the direct examination (44.28%) and culture (36%) (P = 0.37) but the positivity rate of the two techniques were lower than the qPCR. These rates are online with some studies and also the recommendations of WHO [9,20,21,26]. This isexplainedbythe capacity of IS2404-qPCR to reliably detect low genome copies of the bacteria in samples containing live or dead bacteria [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation