2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misleading reporting and interpretation of results in major infertility journals

Abstract: Recommended reporting items are underused in top infertility journals, which could lead to misleading interpretations. Authors, reviewers, and editorial boards should emphasize their use to improve reporting quality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One issue was the robustness of studies and thus general applicability. The robustness of the evidence base in reproductive medicine has been discussed ( Evers, 2013 , Barratt, 2016a , 2016b ; Glujovsky et al , 2016 ) and is of course not just a theme in reproductive medicine ( Baker, 2016 ). Robust methods must be developed and subsequently utilized.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Research Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One issue was the robustness of studies and thus general applicability. The robustness of the evidence base in reproductive medicine has been discussed ( Evers, 2013 , Barratt, 2016a , 2016b ; Glujovsky et al , 2016 ) and is of course not just a theme in reproductive medicine ( Baker, 2016 ). Robust methods must be developed and subsequently utilized.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Research Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is caused in part by a lack of solid evidence linking variation in individual genes to human male infertility. The notion of sub-optimal quality of evidence in male infertility research is not limited to genetic studies but is considered a general concern in the field of reproductive biology (Evers, 2013; Barratt, 2016; Glujovsky et al , 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is caused in part by a lack of solid evidence linking variation in individual genes to human male infertility. The notion of sub-optimal quality of evidence in male infertility research is not limited to genetic studies but is considered a general concern in the field of reproductive biology (Barratt 2016; Evers 2013; Glujovsky et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%