2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mismatch strain programmed shape transformation of curved bilayer-flexible support assembly

Abstract: Shape transformation in three dimensional (3D) structures is of interest in the design of engineered systems capable of accomplishing particular tasks that are unachievable by two dimensional (2D) architectures or static 3D ones. One approach involves the incorporation of stimuli responsive materials into the structural assembly to induce such transformations. In this work, we investigate the transformation of a curved bilayer ribbon supported by a flexible assembly that belongs to a family of complex three di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This remarkable difference in behavior arises because the curvature transforms the ligaments from straight columns that buckle to bistable arches that snap. It should be also noted that such response is completely different from that of porous cylindrical shells which under compression exhibit uniform buckling-induced shape transformation (38)(39)(40), whereas it shares similarities with structures consisting of an array of beams resting on flexible supports, which have recently shown to exhibit a very rich response (41,42). The behavior of our system can be further understood by looking at its behavior surface (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This remarkable difference in behavior arises because the curvature transforms the ligaments from straight columns that buckle to bistable arches that snap. It should be also noted that such response is completely different from that of porous cylindrical shells which under compression exhibit uniform buckling-induced shape transformation (38)(39)(40), whereas it shares similarities with structures consisting of an array of beams resting on flexible supports, which have recently shown to exhibit a very rich response (41,42). The behavior of our system can be further understood by looking at its behavior surface (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The commercially available finite element analysis package ABAQUS[71] for understanding the mechanics of the stimulus‐responsive shape transformation behavior of Kirigami‐cut bilayers was used. Following an already established protocol,[40,43,72–74] the mismatch strain‐driven bilayer morphing was modeled as an equivalent thermal expansion problem where one layer expands with respect to the other in response to a hypothetical temperature. In our computations, 4‐node general purpose shell elements with through‐thickness variation in material properties (the element size was determined from separate mesh refinement studies) and appropriate boundary conditions were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently reported approaches utilize geometrical transformation of 2D precursor structures into 3D architectures by processes of compressive buckling induced by a prestrained elastomer support. Such methods are of interest due to their intrinsic compatibility with a broad range of advanced materials that exist naturally in 2D forms, their high speed, parallel operation, and their applicability over characteristic length scales from nanometers to centimeters . A particularly attractive feature is in the quantitative agreement between analytical modeling of this process and experimental observation, and the associated capability in using computation as a rigorous design tool for defining layouts of 2D precursor and spatial configurations of their bonding to the underlying elastomer that yield 3D structures of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important limitation of past work in this area is that the compressive forces responsible for the 2D to 3D transformation process follow from relaxation of strains in a prestretched, uniform elastomer substrate. The spatially invariant magnitude of the resulting forces poses certain constraints on the range of 3D geometries that can be produced . Detailed studies exist on the buckling mechanics of the 2D precursors, but without significant attention to the mechanics of the substrates that provide the buckling force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation