2014
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2014.120100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missile guidance with constrained intercept body angle

Abstract: A linear quadratic based missile guidance law is presented that imposes a predetermined terminal body angle. Solutions are provided for arbitrary order autopilot dynamics, with explicit analytical expressions given for first-order and zero-lag dynamics.Performance is demonstrated through simulation in a planar interception scenario.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A different scheme for integrated missile guidance [18] also utilizes adaptive dynamic surface control but with input saturation. Furthermore, it has also been proposed that for a maneuvering missile, the body angle at which the target is intercepted is the sum of the flight path angle and the angle of attack [19] and therefore it should not be disregarded because it is significant in several cases.…”
Section: Incas Bulletin Volume 9 Issue 2/ 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different scheme for integrated missile guidance [18] also utilizes adaptive dynamic surface control but with input saturation. Furthermore, it has also been proposed that for a maneuvering missile, the body angle at which the target is intercepted is the sum of the flight path angle and the angle of attack [19] and therefore it should not be disregarded because it is significant in several cases.…”
Section: Incas Bulletin Volume 9 Issue 2/ 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For maneuvering targets, Idan et al 4 proposed an optimal planar interception law to achieve a given interception angle with constraints on the initial and the final flight-path angles of the interceptor. Optimal guidance laws with terminal impact angle constraints in the form of the state feedback for the lag-free and the first order lag systems were proposed by Ryoo et al 5 Considering the dynamics of the angle of attack, a guidance law for achieving the required terminal body angle was discussed by Rusnak et al 6 Optimal impact angle constraint guidance laws were also addressed in Refs. [7] and [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on the IR signatures of rocket exhaust plumes have been conducted at a zero AOA (α, angle between thrust and vehicle velocity vector) [10][11][12][13]. However, the launch vehicle or missile travels with a varying AOA according to the attitude adjustment and tactical conditions [14,15]. Generally, a moderate AOA is less than 30°, however, higher values can be employed under extreme conditions [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%