2011 17th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icdsp.2011.6004930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing feature mask generation in BSS outputs using pitch frequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the AV16.3 corpus since only the real microphone (mixture) measurements are available and we do not have access to the original speech sources, the performance can not be evaluated using [34]. We thus use pitch as a feature to compare separation performance [35], considering the fact that speech sections at different time slots have different pitches [36] and given that the original sources do not have substantially overlapping pitch characteristics. The pitch difference is given as,…”
Section: ) Evaluation Of Separation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the AV16.3 corpus since only the real microphone (mixture) measurements are available and we do not have access to the original speech sources, the performance can not be evaluated using [34]. We thus use pitch as a feature to compare separation performance [35], considering the fact that speech sections at different time slots have different pitches [36] and given that the original sources do not have substantially overlapping pitch characteristics. The pitch difference is given as,…”
Section: ) Evaluation Of Separation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the results objectively, the features of the separated signals should be used. Pitch information is one of the http://asp.eurasipjournals.com/content/2012/1/183 features which can help to evaluate the separation performance, because different speech sections at different time slots have different pitches [31] provided that the original sources do not have substantially overlapping pitch characteristics. We adopt the sawtooth waveform inspired pitch estimator (SWIPE) method [32], which has better performance compared with traditional pitch estimators.…”
Section: Pitch Based Evaluation For Real Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%