2018
DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing inflectional features and missing exponents in DP-internal agreement asymmetries

Abstract: This paper focuses on different types of agreement asymmetries within the DP in which postnominal modifiers exhibit full agreement while in prenominal modifiers agreement can fail in different ways. The main lines of the optimality-theoretic proposal in Bonet, Lloret & Mascaró (2015) are followed, but it is shown, through a comparison of two Northern Italian varieties, that their constraint set cannot account for varieties of Friulian, where the plural exponent fails to surface in plural contexts. It is argued… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Languages like Spanish which only have high plurals are predicted to have no plural class comparable to -a plurals. This prediction is not available under Bonet's (2018) proposal. I return to this line of argument in section 3.…”
Section: (5) Nummentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Languages like Spanish which only have high plurals are predicted to have no plural class comparable to -a plurals. This prediction is not available under Bonet's (2018) proposal. I return to this line of argument in section 3.…”
Section: (5) Nummentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, in languages like Italian (11a), vocalic inflections alternate according to both gender and number, inviting the conclusion that plural is associated with the lower Class position and therefore externalized together with gender. Furthermore, the two plural morphologies (namely the vocalic plural of Italian and the -s plural of Spanish) can combine, as in Friulian (11c) (Bonet 2018;Savoia et al 2018).…”
Section: (5) Nummentioning
confidence: 99%