2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing Slice Recovery for Tensors Using a Low-Rank Model in Embedded Space

Abstract: Let us consider a case where all of the elements in some continuous slices are missing in tensor data. In this case, the nuclear-norm and total variation regularization methods usually fail to recover the missing elements. The key problem is capturing some delay/shift-invariant structure. In this study, we consider a low-rank model in an embedded space of a tensor. For this purpose, we extend a delay embedding for a time series to a "multi-way delay-embedding transform" for a tensor, which takes a given incomp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, this process is regards as a standard DET. For a rigorous expression of the DET, we define as the duplication matrix, which satisfies [ 45 ]: …”
Section: Proposed Slrgsd Framework For Bearing Fault Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, this process is regards as a standard DET. For a rigorous expression of the DET, we define as the duplication matrix, which satisfies [ 45 ]: …”
Section: Proposed Slrgsd Framework For Bearing Fault Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related technique, low-rank tensor modeling in embedded space, was recently studied by [75]. However, the modeling approaches here are quite different since it considered the multilinear approach, while we consider the nonlinear (manifold) approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the modeling approaches here are quite different since it considered the multilinear approach, while we consider the nonlinear (manifold) approach. Thus, our study can be interpreted as a manifold version of [75] from the perspective of tensor completion methods. Note that Yokota et al [75] applied their model to only the tensor completion task.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To decrease the sample complexity of TriTNN, it will be helpful to follow the suggestions in [44] to design new atomic norms like [46]. To get better visual completion performances, the authors would like to consider adding smoothness regularization in the model like [47][48][49] and adopting different tensorization methods like [50]. It is also helpful for studying new tensor completion models using deep neural networks [51].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%