2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0954-349x(02)00023-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing women in Indian districts: a quantitative analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender discrimination in India is a significant issue, and has been a consistent source of concern for policy makers and academics (Sen, 1992;World Bank, 2001;Duflo, 2005;World Bank, 2006). A large literature in economics, sociology and anthropology has explored the underlying causes of discrimination against women in India, highlighting the dowry system, low levels of female education, and other socioeconomic factors as central factors (Rosenzweig and Shultz, 1982;Agnihotri, 2000;Agnihotri et al, 2002;Murthi et al, 1995;Rahman and Rao, 2004;Qian, 2006). Changing these underlying factors is difficult; introducing television, or reducing any barriers to its spread, may be less so.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender discrimination in India is a significant issue, and has been a consistent source of concern for policy makers and academics (Sen, 1992;World Bank, 2001;Duflo, 2005;World Bank, 2006). A large literature in economics, sociology and anthropology has explored the underlying causes of discrimination against women in India, highlighting the dowry system, low levels of female education, and other socioeconomic factors as central factors (Rosenzweig and Shultz, 1982;Agnihotri, 2000;Agnihotri et al, 2002;Murthi et al, 1995;Rahman and Rao, 2004;Qian, 2006). Changing these underlying factors is difficult; introducing television, or reducing any barriers to its spread, may be less so.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a case, the wife has no independent choice and may not be empowered to any significant extent by her outside work. This result is at odds with the view of some economists (e.g., Agnihotri et al, 1998;Anand and Sen, 1995) who treat the earning of income outside the home by wives as a variable leading to their empowerment. We argue here that the causal significance of such a variable depends on the cultural context in which it is embedded, and seems to be different in an Indian context from a Western one.…”
Section: Variables To Be Considered As Determinants Of the Status Of mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Development of this index was greatly influenced by Amartya Sen (Anand and Sen, 1995) and reflects his views about the importance of entitlements as determinants of the well-being of individuals. In addition, Agnihotri, Palmer-Jones, and Parikh (1998) extensively use female participation rates in the workforce in their spatial (regional) study of female-male ratios in India. These ratios are often employed as indicators of the status of females in comparison to males.…”
Section: Variables To Be Considered As Determinants Of the Status Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in a context of overall low female autonomy (compared to much of the rest of the world), a North-South divide has often been remarked on that shows in the northern and north-western parts of India having both distinct kinship systems and demographic regimes, including adverse-to-females sex ratios, that are consistent with less female say in household decisions, mobility and entitlement to resources than in the southern and south-eastern parts of the country (Sopher 1980;Miller 1981 Agnihotri et al 2002). The most influential characterisation of the northern and southern kinship systems in terms of their implications for female autonomy and demographic outcomes is that of Dyson and Moore (1983).…”
Section: Background: India's North-south Divide In Female Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%