14th AIAA/AHI Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-8017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mission Trade-Off Analysis of the Italian USV Re-Entry Flying Test Bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those materials have the potential to be used as aerodynamic control surfaces during hypersonic flight or as protective material in regions of heat shields where the use of conventional material is prohibited due to the high heat fluxes respectively temperatures expected. Thus, maturing the UHTC technology is enabling for the design of aerodynamic efficient pointed hypersonic craft [28]. The aerodynamic shape of the EXPERT winglets and the verification of the design is based on CFD and thermo-structural analysis [29].…”
Section: Uhtcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those materials have the potential to be used as aerodynamic control surfaces during hypersonic flight or as protective material in regions of heat shields where the use of conventional material is prohibited due to the high heat fluxes respectively temperatures expected. Thus, maturing the UHTC technology is enabling for the design of aerodynamic efficient pointed hypersonic craft [28]. The aerodynamic shape of the EXPERT winglets and the verification of the design is based on CFD and thermo-structural analysis [29].…”
Section: Uhtcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected aerodynamic shape is based on a winged body concept [11,12]. The advantages of using a winged body that relies on improved low-speed flight, landing performance, and hypersonic maneuverability must be weighed against the complexity of the design by aerodynamics, aerothermodynamics, and structural point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main results of the trade-off phase, together with the current baseline mission profile and configuration and the main requirements of the vehicle, are described in references [1] and [2]. More details about the reasons that drove the aerodynamic design are instead given in reference [3], where the evolution from the configuration 1.1.2 to the 3.9.2_FW50 is described; this evolution comes from the need of increasing, on one side, the aerodynamic efficiency and, on the other side, the vehicle stability and trimmability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%