2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIST: Multiple Instance Self-Training Framework for Video Anomaly Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sultani et al [22] propose the MIL framework using only video-level labels and introduce the large-scale anomaly detection dataset, UCF-Crime. This work inspires quite a few follow-up studies [28], [17], [4], [14], [26], [25], [6], [23], [26]. .…”
Section: General Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Sultani et al [22] propose the MIL framework using only video-level labels and introduce the large-scale anomaly detection dataset, UCF-Crime. This work inspires quite a few follow-up studies [28], [17], [4], [14], [26], [25], [6], [23], [26]. .…”
Section: General Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Furthermore, the proposed approach does not optimize the feature space with any additional supervision. Some approaches such as Geogescu et al [9] and Feng et al [7] use additional supervision with pseudo labels to improve the latent features, enhancing accuracy of anomaly detection. On the other hand, our approach learns an accurate fusion of temporal and spatial scores without modifying the underlying feature space through additional supervision.…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While outlier exposure assumes labeled anomalies, our work aims at exploiting unlabeled anomalies in the training data. Notably, Pang et al (2020) have used an iterative scheme to detect abnormal frames in video clips, and Feng et al (2021) extend it to supervised video anomaly detection. Our work is more general and provides a principled way to improve the training strategy of all approaches mentioned in the paragraph "deep anomaly detection" when the training data is likely contaminated.…”
Section: Deep Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%