2023
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202336504002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating impact of risks on economic integration between entities in agrifood supply chain

Abstract: The paper aims to assess and reduce the risks associated with infrastructure, financial, natural and environmental, farm management, and political changes among smallholders in tomato supply chain entities. Uncertainties related to the producer, buyer, infrastructure, finance, natural and environmental, management, and political changes in STSC take into account risk levels' assessment. These threats were assessed using Fuzzy Linguistic Quantifier Order Weighted Aggregation (FLQOWA) model. The obtained results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fornes et al studied the management of quality, supplier selection, and cold-storage contracts in AFSC and found that based on different scenarios, the value of the stochastic solutions shows that modeling and solving the proposed stochastic model minimizes costs by an average of around 6.4%, and the expected value of perfect information demonstrates that using a proactive strategy could cost up to 9% [14]. Pardaev et al assessed the impact of risk on economic integration between entities in AFSC and found that applying "written contract" and "insurance" to collaborative relationships to reduce risk levels has been shown to reduce risks to coefficients of 0.6 [15]. Esteso et al proposed a tool based on a system dynamics model to determine the robustness of an already designed five-stage fresh AFSC and its planting planning to disruption in demand, supply, transport, and the operability of its nodes [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fornes et al studied the management of quality, supplier selection, and cold-storage contracts in AFSC and found that based on different scenarios, the value of the stochastic solutions shows that modeling and solving the proposed stochastic model minimizes costs by an average of around 6.4%, and the expected value of perfect information demonstrates that using a proactive strategy could cost up to 9% [14]. Pardaev et al assessed the impact of risk on economic integration between entities in AFSC and found that applying "written contract" and "insurance" to collaborative relationships to reduce risk levels has been shown to reduce risks to coefficients of 0.6 [15]. Esteso et al proposed a tool based on a system dynamics model to determine the robustness of an already designed five-stage fresh AFSC and its planting planning to disruption in demand, supply, transport, and the operability of its nodes [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%