2020
DOI: 10.1037/tra0000739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating social and economic sources of trauma: The need for universal basic income during the coronavirus pandemic.

Abstract: The COVID-19 Pandemic is projected to cause an economic shock larger than the Global Financial Crisis of 2007/2008 and a recession as great as anything seen since the Great Depression in 1930s. The social and economic consequences of lockdowns and social distancing measures, such as unemployment, broken relationships and homelessness create potential for inter-generational trauma extending decades into the future. In this article, we argue that, in the absence of a vaccine, governments need to introduce Univer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Policies that protect the social determinants of mental health, such as secure housing, income, employment and access to healthcare outside of employment, may reduce the impact of this moment on mental health. 19 46 Policy makers may consider, for example, eviction moratoria, 47 48 income support (such as through extending the Paycheck Protection Program 49 or the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act stimuli, 50 51 or other universal basic income interventions 52 ), paid sick leave, 53 and health insurance that is not tied to employment. 53 In general, countries with more generous social and economic policies (such as family leave, social insurance and sick benefits) have lower rates of mental illness and lower levels of inequality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policies that protect the social determinants of mental health, such as secure housing, income, employment and access to healthcare outside of employment, may reduce the impact of this moment on mental health. 19 46 Policy makers may consider, for example, eviction moratoria, 47 48 income support (such as through extending the Paycheck Protection Program 49 or the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act stimuli, 50 51 or other universal basic income interventions 52 ), paid sick leave, 53 and health insurance that is not tied to employment. 53 In general, countries with more generous social and economic policies (such as family leave, social insurance and sick benefits) have lower rates of mental illness and lower levels of inequality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with emerging literature on the effects of the pandemic on individuals with mental illness, where the COVID-19 pandemic is reported as affecting mental health in myriad ways [ 56 ]. There are some indications that economic relief programs serve to mitigate or prevent trauma from the economic and social effects of the pandemic and the exacerbating effects of public health responses on symptoms of anxiety and depression [ 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The twenty-first century has been characterized by systemic shocks (September 11, 2001, attacks in the United States, the 2007–2008 global financial crisis) that have posed a wide array of challenges for the world of work ( Blustein et al, 2019a ; Johnson et al, 2020 ). The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these challenges, accelerating trends that were already underway, such as insecurity, instability, and continuous changes to work contexts, with a dramatic decline in the number and quality of accessible jobs ( Blustein et al, 2020 ; Kniffin et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introduction: Decent Work and The Psychology Of Working Theory Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%