2005 7th International Conference on Information Fusion 2005
DOI: 10.1109/icif.2005.1591877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating the effects of residual biases with Schmidt-Kalman filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, v o [k] is assumed to be zero. This is in correspondence with the case described in [28]. The main difference between the structure in this case and [29] is the fact that the covariance increases at each time update until a correction is available in [29].…”
Section: Tracking System Based On a Schmidt-kalman Filtersupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, v o [k] is assumed to be zero. This is in correspondence with the case described in [28]. The main difference between the structure in this case and [29] is the fact that the covariance increases at each time update until a correction is available in [29].…”
Section: Tracking System Based On a Schmidt-kalman Filtersupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The equations for the SchmidtKalman filter is described thoroughly in [28] and will not be explained further here. It is important, however, to point out that you don't want to estimate or predict the state δx o , but rather account for the uncertainty.…”
Section: Tracking System Based On a Schmidt-kalman Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DUKF structure in nonetheless differentiated from the standard UKF steps as follows: DUKF updates the observable components of the estimates of the mean vector and covariance matrix during the Kalman updating step:x k|k−1 →x k|k and P k|k−1 → P k|k , using an appropriate Kalman gain matrix defined based on the observable components. The unobservable parts are retained invariant, while the cross terms of the covariance are updated using the Schmidt-Kalman Filter (Schmidt, 1966;Novoselov et al, 2005). The steps of the DUKF algorithm are summarized in detail in Table 2.…”
Section: Discontinuous Unscented Kalman Filter Dukfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of estimating the bias, the authors of [9] proposed to treat the bias as a zero-mean nuisance parameter with known a priori statistics. The impact of the bias could then be mitigated by means of an SKF.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%