2001
DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.2000.1033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating the environmental effects of mariculture through single-point moorings (SPMs) and drifting cages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional multi‐point mooring cages are more complicated to install, 83 and the activity range is more fixed, factors that easily cause local marine environmental pollution and thus are not conducive to the production of high quality aquatic products 50 . Single‐point mooring, in contrast, can effectively increase the activity area of the farming facilities as well as significantly reduce the deposition of feed residues, fish excreta and other waste on the seabed, and requires significantly lower hardware, installation and maintenance costs 59,84 . Therefore, single‐point mooring has been recommended as an alternative to traditional multi‐point mooring 49 .…”
Section: Research Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional multi‐point mooring cages are more complicated to install, 83 and the activity range is more fixed, factors that easily cause local marine environmental pollution and thus are not conducive to the production of high quality aquatic products 50 . Single‐point mooring, in contrast, can effectively increase the activity area of the farming facilities as well as significantly reduce the deposition of feed residues, fish excreta and other waste on the seabed, and requires significantly lower hardware, installation and maintenance costs 59,84 . Therefore, single‐point mooring has been recommended as an alternative to traditional multi‐point mooring 49 .…”
Section: Research Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Singlepoint mooring, in contrast, can effectively increase the activity area of the farming facilities as well as significantly reduce the deposition of feed residues, fish excreta and other waste on the seabed, and requires significantly lower hardware, installation and maintenance costs. 59,84 Therefore, single-point mooring has been recommended as an alternative to traditional multi-point mooring. 49 At present, the world's circular farming facilities generally adopt multi-point moorings, while shipshaped farming facilities mostly adopt single-point moorings.…”
Section: Mooringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feed can transfer diseases and has to be monitored [37]. In marine aquaculture, the design, like single point mooring and siting of pens, can be used to reduce disease likelihoods [82].…”
Section: Preventing Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquaculture has been the world's fastest growing food production sector in the past 40 years. With over one-third of aquaculture produced in marine waters and this proportion increasing, concerns about pollution and health have increased markedly [1]. The deteriorated marine environment around the fish farm has been criticized by environmentalists because the potential waste pollution, such as uneaten feed and fish wastes, accumulates on the seabed and causes water contamination [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce environmental stress, an alternative approach is to allow cages to move in response to the environment. For instance, the use of a single point mooring (SPM) would allow the aquaculture system to maintain a watch circle where the position of the cage depends on the sum of the environmental forces [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%