2020
DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating the impact of selective phenotyping in training populations on the prediction ability by multi‐trait pedigree and genomic selection models

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the amount of information for each OTS, regardless of the kernel, is small, representing between 1.6 and 19.6% of the total available information. Moreover, the samples have a good distribution of genotypes, including those genotypes that perform well, and those that are not so good, bringing positive impacts on PA (Michel et al, 2020). As expected and similar to what Pinho Morais et al (2020) found, with a small effective population size, PA is diminished, since the sample contains small genetic variability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Here, the amount of information for each OTS, regardless of the kernel, is small, representing between 1.6 and 19.6% of the total available information. Moreover, the samples have a good distribution of genotypes, including those genotypes that perform well, and those that are not so good, bringing positive impacts on PA (Michel et al, 2020). As expected and similar to what Pinho Morais et al (2020) found, with a small effective population size, PA is diminished, since the sample contains small genetic variability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This random sampling was however restricted to the same range of phenotypic performance in all four populations to prevent a putative tail effect. Such a tail effect would lead to lower prediction abilities when merely the lower or upper tail of the entire distribution is represented in the training population (e.g., by selective phenotyping of superior performing lines) (Michel et al, 2020b;Zhao et al, 2012). Since the in-house developed lines showed generally a higher performance than the externally developed lines for the investi-gated quality traits, the mentioned restriction was introduced to exclude the influence of such a tail effect when making inferences about the effect of the genetic distance on genomic predictions.…”
Section: Single-trait and Multitrait Genomic Prediction Across Breeding Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the amount of information for each OTS, regardless of the kernel, is small, representing between 1.6 and 19.6% of the total available information. Moreover, the samples have an adequate distribution of genotypes, including those that perform well and those that are subpar, bringing positive impacts on PA [ 37 ]. As expected and similar to the findings of Pinho Morais et al [ 43 ], PA is diminished with a small effective population size since the sample contains low genetic variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%