Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation)

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from post-consumer waste and wastewater are a small contributor (about 3%) to total global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Emissions for 2004-2005 totalled 1.4 Gt CO2-eq year(-1) relative to total emissions from all sectors of 49 Gt CO2-eq year(-1) [including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and F-gases normalized according to their 100-year global warming potentials (GWP)]. The CH4 from landfills and wastewater collectively accounted for about 90% of waste sector emissions, or about 18% of global anthropogenic methane emissions (which were about 14% of the global total in 2004). Wastewater N2O and CO2 from the incineration of waste containing fossil carbon (plastics; synthetic textiles) are minor sources. Due to the wide range of mature technologies that can mitigate GHG emissions from waste and provide public health, environmental protection, and sustainable development co-benefits, existing waste management practices can provide effective mitigation of GHG emissions from this sector. Current mitigation technologies include landfill gas recovery, improved landfill practices, and engineered wastewater management. In addition, significant GHG generation is avoided through controlled composting, state-of-the-art incineration, and expanded sanitation coverage. Reduced waste generation and the exploitation of energy from waste (landfill gas, incineration, anaerobic digester biogas) produce an indirect reduction of GHG emissions through the conservation of raw materials, improved energy and resource efficiency, and fossil fuel avoidance. Flexible strategies and financial incentives can expand waste management options to achieve GHG mitigation goals; local technology decisions are influenced by a variety of factors such as waste quantity and characteristics, cost and financing issues, infrastructure requirements including available land area, collection and transport considerations, and regulatory constraints. Existing studies on mitigation potentials and costs for the waste sector tend to focus on landfill CH4 as the baseline. The commercial recovery of landfill CH4 as a source of renewable energy has been practised at full scale since 1975 and currently exceeds 105 Mt CO2-eq year(-1). Although landfill CH4 emissions from developed countries have been largely stabilized, emissions from developing countries are increasing as more controlled (anaerobic) landfilling practices are implemented; these emissions could be reduced by accelerating the introduction of engineered gas recovery, increasing rates of waste minimization and recycling, and implementing alternative waste management strategies provided they are affordable, effective, and sustainable. Aided by Kyoto mechanisms such as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint Implementation (JI), the total global economic mitigation potential for reducing waste sector emissions in 2030 is estimated to be > 1000 Mt CO2-eq (or 70% of estimated emissions) at costs below 100 US$ t(-1) CO2-eq year(-1). An estimated 20...

How Assessment Methods Can Support Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries—A Critical Review

“…These methodologies are simplified procedures to estimate local or regional emissions and emission reduction potential by alternative waste treatment options [74]. Fewer studies look into more detail of the waste treatment process and verify through evidence if the parameters used in the CDM methods are justified [75]. Next to the climate relevant emissions large new infrastructure projects also typically require an environmental impact assessment (EIA).…”

A Review of Solid Waste Management Practice in Dhaka City, Bangladesh

“…Rapid growth of industries, lack of financial resources, inadequate trained manpower, inappropriate technology and lack of awareness of the community are the major constraints of solid waste management for the fast growing metropolis of Dhaka [1]. Both quantity and volume of this waste have increased rapidly as the city population [15,16,17]. Daily production of solid waste in Dhaka City is more than 4000 Metric Tons of which 200 Metric Tons hospital and clinical waste contain toxic chemicals, radioactive elements and pathological substances.…”

Mineral CO2 sequestration by environmental biotechnological processes

“…2.4d). As complications related to use of membranes such as (bio)fouling are considered to be one of the main problems for efficient application of BES technology (Bogner et al, 2007), this is an important added-value to the BES technology.…”

“…The global sequestration potential of biodegradable solid waste and wastewater by AD process can be estimated based on its sequestration yield which is 1-kg CO 2 /2.9-kg COD. Biodegradation of the organic carbon content of the solid waste and municipal wastewater generated globally each year (Bogner et al, 2007;Sakai et al, 1996) by anaerobic digestion employing silicates is estimated to be able to sequester 1.3-1.5 % wt/wt and 0.2-0.4 % wt/wt of the total anthropogenic CO 2 released to the atmosphere, respectively. This contribution does not include AD treatment of the industrial wastewater such as food, paper and pulp industries with high organic carbon concentrations.…”