2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16324-6_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigation of Pounding Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thorough studies have been performed to improve safety precautions to avoid pounding risk. Such precautions evaluated and developed an adequate separation distance between possible pounding structures to prevent contact during potential extensive lateralload occurrences [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. Additionally, when designing and planning for newly constructed structures, pounding risk can be assessed for existing structures to avoid the occurrence of structural pounding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thorough studies have been performed to improve safety precautions to avoid pounding risk. Such precautions evaluated and developed an adequate separation distance between possible pounding structures to prevent contact during potential extensive lateralload occurrences [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. Additionally, when designing and planning for newly constructed structures, pounding risk can be assessed for existing structures to avoid the occurrence of structural pounding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between these methods concluded that SRSS can be practical and provide the required separation distance [11][12]. The need of providing mitigation methods between buildings that do not have enough gap were discussed in [13] by providing a numerical study with different ground motion records to simulate the pounding between light-mass and heavy-mass three-story buildings. The research objective was to measure the efficiency of the available mitigation methods in reducing the required seismic gaps based on time historyanalysis with nonlinear viscoelastic model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%