1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00318.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in populations of Siberian and European roe deer (Capreolus pygargus and C. capreolus)

Abstract: We have amplified and sequenced 679 nucleotides of the mitochondrial DNA control-region in 45 Siberian (Capreolus pygargus) and European (C. capreolus) roe deer from two localities in Russia and seven in Italy. Average interspecific sequence divergence was 4.9%. Six different haplotypes were found in Siberian roe deer, and 14 haplotypes in Alpine European roe deer. A population of the endemic Italian subspecies C. c. italicus was monomorphic bearing a single haplotype with one unique nucleotide deletion and a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
44
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study examined the nucleotide diversity (Å = 0.00392 ± 0.00046) and haplotype diversity (h = 0.792 ± 0.037) among 71 samples of blue sheep collected from throughout the NHMNR. Molecular variation measured in terms of nucleotide diversity is an order of magnitude lower than corresponding values reported for four bovine species from similar studies based on variation in the mtDNA D-loop region: white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus (Zimmermann, 1780); Å = 0.026; Moscarella et al 2003), Swayne's hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus swaynei; Å = 0.044 ± 0.022; Flagstad et al 2000), eastern roe deer (Capreolus pygargus (Pallas, 1771); Å = 0.012; Randi et al 1998), and eastern African buffalo (Syncerus caffer (Sparrman, 1779); Å = 0.038 ± 0.002; Hooft et al 2002). Nevertheless, the levels of genetic diversity detected were similar to those in other species that have undergone bottlenecks, including koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus (Goldfuss, 1817); h = 0.379 ± 0.016, Å = 0.0022 ± 0.0001; Fowler et al 2000), Sichuan takin (Budorcas taxicolor Hodgson, 1850; h = 0.718, Å = 0.0086; Li et al 2003), and white-breasted wood-wren (Henicorhina leucosticta (Cabanis, 1847); h = 0.75, Å = 0.0052 ± 0.0005; Brown et al 2004).…”
Section: Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This study examined the nucleotide diversity (Å = 0.00392 ± 0.00046) and haplotype diversity (h = 0.792 ± 0.037) among 71 samples of blue sheep collected from throughout the NHMNR. Molecular variation measured in terms of nucleotide diversity is an order of magnitude lower than corresponding values reported for four bovine species from similar studies based on variation in the mtDNA D-loop region: white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus (Zimmermann, 1780); Å = 0.026; Moscarella et al 2003), Swayne's hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus swaynei; Å = 0.044 ± 0.022; Flagstad et al 2000), eastern roe deer (Capreolus pygargus (Pallas, 1771); Å = 0.012; Randi et al 1998), and eastern African buffalo (Syncerus caffer (Sparrman, 1779); Å = 0.038 ± 0.002; Hooft et al 2002). Nevertheless, the levels of genetic diversity detected were similar to those in other species that have undergone bottlenecks, including koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus (Goldfuss, 1817); h = 0.379 ± 0.016, Å = 0.0022 ± 0.0001; Fowler et al 2000), Sichuan takin (Budorcas taxicolor Hodgson, 1850; h = 0.718, Å = 0.0086; Li et al 2003), and white-breasted wood-wren (Henicorhina leucosticta (Cabanis, 1847); h = 0.75, Å = 0.0052 ± 0.0005; Brown et al 2004).…”
Section: Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The Siberian roe deer is closely related to the European roe deer ( Capreolus capreolus, 2n = 70), but these two species do have some morphological and karyological differences and are well resolved in molecular phylogenies [21,22]. The only derived karyotypic character of the Siberian roe deer is the presence of B chromosomes [23], the number of supernumerary elements usually varies both between individuals and between cells within the same individual albeit some individuals may possess a stable number of Bs [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a Bayesian approach implemented in BEAST v1.7.2 software (Drummond et al 2012) to calculate the time of divergence between European and Asian moose, and also between two distinct European clades (Central Europe and Ural), and between particular groups/branches from clade Central Europe for concatenated control region and cytochrome b sequences. A strict molecular clock was applied with previously reported mutation rates for control region (4 and 8 % Ma) and cytochrome b (2 % Ma) in ungulates (Randi et al 1998). Due to the fact that the mutation rate has not been calibrated for moose, we also used a mutation rate of 31.4 % per million years for mtDNA-cr derived for domestic cattle (Bradley et al 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%