2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-767-9_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitochondrial Genome and Plant Taxonomy

Abstract: The lability in size, structure, and sequence content of mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) across plant species has sharply limited its use in taxonomic studies. However, due to the new opportunities offered by the availability of complete mtDNA sequence in plant species and the subsequent development of universal primers, the number of mtDNA-based molecular studies has recently increased. Historically, universal primers have enabled to characterize mtDNA polymorphism mainly by the RFLP technique. This methodology … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike chloroplast and nuclear genes, polymorphism in the mitochondrial genome (hereafter mitogenome) is not frequently used to reconstruct phylogenies and phylogeographies or for DNA barcoding in higher plants, which stands in contrast with studies on animals (e.g., Donnelly et al, 2017;Duminil, 2014;Govindarajulu, Parks, Tennessen, Liston, & Ashman, 2015;Mower, Sloan, & Alverson, 2012;Qiu et al, 2006). This is due to three main reasons: First, mitochondrial genes of plants usually evolve slowly compared to those of the plastome (three to four times slower) or the nuclear genome (~12 times slower; Wolfe, Li, & Sharp, 1987;Palmer & Herbon, 1988;Palmer, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike chloroplast and nuclear genes, polymorphism in the mitochondrial genome (hereafter mitogenome) is not frequently used to reconstruct phylogenies and phylogeographies or for DNA barcoding in higher plants, which stands in contrast with studies on animals (e.g., Donnelly et al, 2017;Duminil, 2014;Govindarajulu, Parks, Tennessen, Liston, & Ashman, 2015;Mower, Sloan, & Alverson, 2012;Qiu et al, 2006). This is due to three main reasons: First, mitochondrial genes of plants usually evolve slowly compared to those of the plastome (three to four times slower) or the nuclear genome (~12 times slower; Wolfe, Li, & Sharp, 1987;Palmer & Herbon, 1988;Palmer, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another assumption could be made, that sunflower chloroplast CDS evolve approximately 2.5-3 faster than mitochondrial CDS. For real establishment of this supposition we have not enough data, but according to published data the rate of substitutions in mitochondrial and chloroplast angiosperms genes is 1:3 (Drouin et al, 2008;Duminil, 2014). It is interesting to note, that the frequency of nonsynonymous SNP is, conversely, 1.6 fold higher in mtDNA (0.04/1kb), than in cpDNA (0.025/1kb).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In recent years, the development of sequencing technology (including high throughput sequencing and single-cell sequencing) offers a fast and cost-effective method for sequencing the whole mtDNA genome (Grabherr et al, 2011;Sloan, 2013). The exploitation of universal and conserved mitochondrial primers (Duminil, 2014;Pereira et al, 2018), combined with opportunities offered by the availability of complete mtDNA sequence in plant species, facilitate the mtDNA-based molecular studies. Moreover, the emergence of mitochondrial genome editing technology (RNA-free DddAderived cytosine base editors and mitoTALENs) enables the study of mitochondrial gene functions to be carried out in-depth (Kazama et al, 2019;Arimura et al, 2020;Mok et al, 2020).…”
Section: H 2 S and No Affect Mtdna Oxidative Damagementioning
confidence: 99%