2014
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitonuclear interactions: evolutionary consequences over multiple biological scales

Abstract: Fundamental biological processes hinge on coordinated interactions between genes spanning two obligate genomes—mitochondrial and nuclear. These interactions are key to complex life, and allelic variation that accumulates and persists at the loci embroiled in such intergenomic interactions should therefore be subjected to intense selection to maintain integrity of the mitochondrial electron transport system. Here, we compile evidence that suggests that mitochondrial–nuclear (mitonuclear) allelic interactions ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
223
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(181 reference statements)
7
223
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe the coming years will provide crucial resolution of these questions, inspired by emerging research that suggests a role for the Mother's Curse hypothesis in human reproductive biology (Dowling 2014, Milot et al 2017.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We believe the coming years will provide crucial resolution of these questions, inspired by emerging research that suggests a role for the Mother's Curse hypothesis in human reproductive biology (Dowling 2014, Milot et al 2017.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have routinely linked the genetic variation that delineates naturally occurring 'mtDNA haplotypes' to modifications in a range of phenotypes related to health, such as metabolism, growth and longevity, in both invertebrate (Rand 2001, Meikeljohn et al 2007, Camus et al 2012, Yee et al 2013) and vertebrate metazoans (Fontanillas et al 2005, Smith et al 2010, Boratyński et al 2016. Many of these papers have been reviewed elsewhere (Ballard & Kreitman 1995, Blier 2001, Ballard & Whitlock 2004, Ballard & Rand 2005, Dowling et al 2008, Ballard & Pichaud 2014, Dobler et al 2014, Dowling 2014 and will not be discussed here. Coupled with these findings, it has become increasingly clear that diseasecausing mtDNA mutations might commonly exist at appreciable frequencies within human populations (Chinnery et al 2000, Taylor & Turnbull 2005, Reeve et al 2008, with around one in 200 people estimated to carry a pathogenic mtDNA mutation (Elliott et al 2008), and around one in 5000 ultimately expressing a mitochondrial disease phenotype at some stage of their lives (Thorburn 2004).…”
Section: The Mitochondrial Genotype-phenotype Linkagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, mitochondrial DNA variation in Drosophila preferentially affects genes that are exclusively expressed in the testis (Innocenti et al, 2011). When probed in engineered genotypes that differ only in their mitochondrial DNA haplotype, males display significantly higher genetic variance for longevity than females (Camus et al, 2012;Dowling, 2014;Wolff et al, 2014). Variation in Y-linked heterochromatin is also known to modulate the expression of genes exclusively transcribed in reproductive tissues as well as genes associated with mitochondrial function in Drosophila (Lemos et al, 2008(Lemos et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%