Mixed dimensional modeling of reinforced structures

Abstract

International audienceUsing thin reinforcements is a common way to strengthen structures, as in reinforced concrete for example. From a numerical point of view, dealing with these reinforcements is tedious, because of their diameter which is usually small compared to the characteristic dimensions of the structures, therefore requiring very fine meshes to represent them accurately. In this paper, a new approach allowing to mix a volumic and a lineic modeling of the reinforcements is proposed. Fine meshes with a volumic representation of the reinforcements are used in the zones of interest of the structure, whereas coarser meshes associated to lineic elements are used in the rest of the structure in order to decrease the computing times. A methodology to ensure the transition between both modeling is proposed, so that the results in the zones of interest are similar to the results that would be obtained with a full volumic representation of the reinforcements. The efficiency of the method is illustrated on several examples, involving linear elasticity and plasticity

A mortar-type finite element approach for embedding 1D beams into 3D solid volumes

“…For example, vascular tumor growth is simulated in [19] by coupling the 1D vasculature to the surrounding 3D tissue. The approach recently presented in [21] combines the techniques from Fig. 1b, c by using a 3D representation of the beams in zones of interest and 1D structural models otherwise.…”

A mixed-dimensional CutFEM methodology for the simulation of fibre-reinforced composites

“…Indeed, representing such slender elements using finite elements that are dimensionality consistent with the embedding space leads to prohibitively large computational models. The 3D analysis of large-scale slender elements may at best be performed locally [23]. Away from regions of interest, asymptotic or numerical cross-sectional approximations of the mechanics of these structures need to be derived for numerical models to be tractable.…”

“…Following the taxonomy preposed in [23], three traditional finite element methodologies may be distinguished. In the diffuse approach (see e.g.…”

“…However, elements of the embedding domain need to conform to the geometry of the fibrous reinforcement, leading to additional cost, and potentially to meshing difficulties. Finally, modern computational approach may use an embedded representation of fibres, whereby fibres are explicitly represented but may cross elements of the surrounding material in an arbitrary manner [5,17,23,27]. The present methodology belongs to the latter class of methods.…”

A simple approach for finite element simulation of reinforced plates

“…We emphasise that the concept is quite general, as illustrated in our previous work on embedding in elastic solids, of membranes [4] and of embedded trusses and beams [11]. A similar approach was recently suggested for modelling embedded trusses by Lé, Legrain, and Moës [12].…”