2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed dissimilarity measure for piecewise linear approximation based time series applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The raw data could be used, for example, for testing other data synchronization methods, such as Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) [44], Correlation Optimized Warping (COW) [29], and their various variations and combinations [7,34]. Because the growth of biomass and production of penicillin are the major driving forces governing the behavior of the Pensim process, reducing batch-to-batch differences between these (unmeasured) variables could result in better process monitoring.…”
Section: Dataset Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw data could be used, for example, for testing other data synchronization methods, such as Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) [44], Correlation Optimized Warping (COW) [29], and their various variations and combinations [7,34]. Because the growth of biomass and production of penicillin are the major driving forces governing the behavior of the Pensim process, reducing batch-to-batch differences between these (unmeasured) variables could result in better process monitoring.…”
Section: Dataset Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…period length). Selecting one or more appropriate measures is not trivial (G lynn et al 2006; R efinetti et al 2007; D ing et al 2008; B atista et al 2011; J in 2011; S un et al 2014; Y in et al 2014; B anko and A bonyi 2015; K otsifakos et al 2016; M ori et al 2016). This is particularly true when comparing time series with differently calibrated, non-linear scales that may be associated with substantial measurement errors, as is often the case for experimental observations.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%