2017
DOI: 10.1177/0962280217704225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-effects location and scale Tobit joint models for heterogeneous longitudinal data with skewness, detection limits, and measurement errors

Abstract: The joint modeling of mean and variance for longitudinal data is an active research area. This type of model has the advantage of accounting for heteroscedasticity commonly observed in between and within subject variations. Most of researches focus on improving the estimating efficiency but ignore many data features frequently encountered in practice. In this article, we develop a mixed-effects location scale joint model that concurrently accounts for longitudinal data with multiple features. Specifically, our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mixed-effects location scale model extends the more common applications of latent curve and mixed-effects models to uniquely address heterogeneity of variance both in the random effects at the second level and the within-subject residuals. Some advancements of this framework have included extensions to bivariate versions of the model to study multiple longitudinal variables, including dyad data involving distinguishable individuals (Pugach et al 2014 ), a 3-level model (Lin et al 2018 ), and joint models to handle combinations of response distributions (Lu 2017 ). Most applications have relied on ML estimation, but Bayesian estimation of these models is an alternative (Lin et al).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mixed-effects location scale model extends the more common applications of latent curve and mixed-effects models to uniquely address heterogeneity of variance both in the random effects at the second level and the within-subject residuals. Some advancements of this framework have included extensions to bivariate versions of the model to study multiple longitudinal variables, including dyad data involving distinguishable individuals (Pugach et al 2014 ), a 3-level model (Lin et al 2018 ), and joint models to handle combinations of response distributions (Lu 2017 ). Most applications have relied on ML estimation, but Bayesian estimation of these models is an alternative (Lin et al).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tobit regression models account for censored data [18][19][20][21] and mixed-effect Tobit models further account for clustering of observations in a dataset [21]. Mixed-effect Tobit regression models of the log-transformed contaminants, left-censored at the logtransformed MRL, with normally distributed random intercepts for public water system and state, but no fixed effects, were used to predict the mean log-concentrations of each contaminant for each public water system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MELSMs are more broadly applicable, such as for ordinal outcomes (Hedeker et al, 2016), time-to-event and censored outcomes (Courvoisier et al, 2019;Lu, 2018), and semicontinuous outcomes (i.e., with excess zeros; Blozis et al, 2020) or random effects (Ma et al, 2021). MELSMs have also been extended to dyadic data (Rast & Ferrer, 2018), cross-classified designs (Brunton-Smith et al, 2017), three-level designs (Li & Hedeker, 2012;Lin et al, 2018), and to include nonlinear fixed effects (Bürkner, 2018;Williams et al, 2019).…”
Section: Recap and Spin-offs-melsmsmentioning
confidence: 99%