2021
DOI: 10.15866/ireme.v15i1.19680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Finite Element for the Analysis of FGM Beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the study of Mohamed Ben Ali et al [37] on sandwich structures with two cases of symmetrical double cantilever beam and asymmetrical double cantilever beam. For the work of Benmalek et al [38], the exactitude of the results was highly remarkable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Also the study of Mohamed Ben Ali et al [37] on sandwich structures with two cases of symmetrical double cantilever beam and asymmetrical double cantilever beam. For the work of Benmalek et al [38], the exactitude of the results was highly remarkable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Each layer comprises multiple homogeneous elements with constant material properties, and their characteristics correspond to the centre of each element. This technique was used recently by (Benmalek et al, 2021) in the analysis Fgm beam bending (see Figure .5) and coupled to the virtual crack extension technique (Bouzerd et al, 2011) to compute the energy release rate of crack extension in functionally graded material. (Marur & Tippur, 1998) utilized a gravity-assisted casting technique to produce Fgm specimens using two-part slow-curing epoxy and uncoated solid glass sphere fillers.…”
Section: Crack Simulation In Fgmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the studies above by Rahmani et al [13], Benmalek et al [14], and Salehi et al [15] contribute valuable insights into the bending behaviour of functionally graded beams. They exhibit certain deficiencies that create opportunities for further exploration and improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rahmani et al's [13] work focuses on porous functionally graded beams but lacks a comprehensive exploration of the mixed finite element method, leaving room for advancements in numerical techniques. Benmalek et al [14] introduce a mixed finite element method but do not explicitly address the adaptability of their approach to varying material properties in complex geometries. While considering transient thermal and mechanical stresses, Salehi et al's [15] investigation into functionally graded beams in cylindrical form falls short in highlighting the method's versatility in handling diverse material property distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%