2019
DOI: 10.3390/math7121212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Generalized Multiscale Finite Element Method for Darcy-Forchheimer Model

Abstract: In this paper, the solution of the Darcy-Forchheimer model in high contrast heterogeneous media is studied. This problem is solved by a mixed finite element method (MFEM) on a fine grid (the reference solution), where the pressure is approximated by piecewise constant elements; meanwhile, the velocity is discretized by the lowest order Raviart-Thomas elements. The solution on a coarse grid is performed by using the mixed generalized multiscale finite element method (mixed GMsFEM). The nonlinear equation can be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following examples, we set µ = 1 and ρ = 1. The Darcy-Forchheimer coefficient are taken to be β = β 0 κ −1 [13,29,30], where the parameter β 0 control the influence of the nonlinear term and we will test cases with β 0 = 1, β 0 = 10, β 0 = 100, β 0 = 1000 and β 0 = 10000, respectively. Denote the fine-grid solution by (p f , u f ), suppose the multiscale solution is denoted by (p ms , u ms ), then the relative L 2 errors for pressure and velocity are denoted as follows Erp(p ms ) := p ms − p f / p f and Eru(u ms ) := u ms − u f / u f .…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the following examples, we set µ = 1 and ρ = 1. The Darcy-Forchheimer coefficient are taken to be β = β 0 κ −1 [13,29,30], where the parameter β 0 control the influence of the nonlinear term and we will test cases with β 0 = 1, β 0 = 10, β 0 = 100, β 0 = 1000 and β 0 = 10000, respectively. Denote the fine-grid solution by (p f , u f ), suppose the multiscale solution is denoted by (p ms , u ms ), then the relative L 2 errors for pressure and velocity are denoted as follows Erp(p ms ) := p ms − p f / p f and Eru(u ms ) := u ms − u f / u f .…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model reduction techniques are required to reduce computational complexity. Spiridonov et al [13] utilized the mixed generalized multiscale finite element method (mixed GMsFEM) to approximate the Darcy-Forchheimer model on the coarse grid. The mixed GMsFEM is originally developed in [14] for Darcy's flow in heterogeneous media, the multiscale basis functions for velocity are constructed following the GMsFEM framework [15,16,17,18,19,20] which generalizes the multiscale finite element method (MsFEM) [21] by enriching the coarse-grid space systematically with additional multiscale basis functions that can help to reduce the error efficiently and substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effective characteristics of the heterogeneous medium are calculated in local domains to describe the process on a coarse grid. The gas filtration model is a nonlinear problem, and to resolve the nonlinearity, we use the Picard iteration method [6,5,4]. In this work, we present the numerical experiments for several problems with the different physical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the parameter-dependent model and the thermoelastic model with phase flow, the strategy of multiscale model reduction was addressed in [8][9][10][11][12]. Besides, there were other techniques such as multiscale reduced-basis method [8,10,13,14], localized orthogonal decomposition [15], weak Galerkin GMsFEM [16], mixed GMsFEM [17], multiscale-spectral GFEM [18], meshfree GMsFEM [19], higher-order three-scale method [20] and local discontinuous Galerkin method [21], were applied in a large number of interested fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%