2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1062739147030117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed integer linear programming formulations for open pit production scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note thatp bt is computed as (4) require that each block can be extracted no more than once. Constraints (5) ensure that the minimum and maximum operational resource constraints are satisfied each period. We assume here that q br > 0, which is a commonly used in practice and permits feasible solutions more readily than without it; as such, the formulation only contains lower and upper bounds but omits constructs that would lend themselves to blending.…”
Section: The Constrained Pit Limit Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note thatp bt is computed as (4) require that each block can be extracted no more than once. Constraints (5) ensure that the minimum and maximum operational resource constraints are satisfied each period. We assume here that q br > 0, which is a commonly used in practice and permits feasible solutions more readily than without it; as such, the formulation only contains lower and upper bounds but omits constructs that would lend themselves to blending.…”
Section: The Constrained Pit Limit Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we define the coefficients q br andq brd , corresponding to constraints (5) and (10) in (CPIT ) and (PCPSP ). This entry consists of n lines, where n is at most the total number of non-zero coefficients in the aforementioned constraints.…”
Section: D110 Resource Constraint Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) is a powerful tool extensively used in the literature for mine planning optimization. Typical mine planning models maximize the NPV over the mine-life, with respect to the mining and processing capacities, ore blending constraints, and spatial precedence among mining blocks (Johnson, 1969;Askari-Nasab and Awuah-Offei, 2009;Askari-Nasab et al, 2011). Further than the pure long-term mine planning models, few works are published addressing the linkage between mine planning and tailings production (Kalantari et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of mixed integer linear programming (MILP) is a modelling approach well suited to formulate the mine scheduling optimisation problem. Compared to open pit applications (for example [1,2,3,21]), the research published on underground mine scheduling problems is limited. Earlier references to the use of MILP formulations can be found in the publications by Carlyle & Eaves [4], Rahal et al [14] and Smith et al [19], although no model formulations were provided in these papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%