2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11768-009-7169-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed L 1/H-infinity control for uncertain linear singular systems

Abstract: The mixed L1/H-infinity control problem for a class of uncertain linear singular systems is considered using a matrix inequality approach. The purpose is to design a state feedback control law such that the resultant closed-loop system is regular, impulse-free, stable and satisfies some given mixed L1/H-infinity performance. A sufficient condition for the existence of such control law is given in terms of a set of matrix inequalities by the introduction of inescapable set and * -norm. When these matrix inequal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the mixed  ∞ ∕ 1 approach separately optimizes over two different classes of input signals, while the approach considered in our paper performs a double optimization (peak and energy) over the same class of inputs. Moreover, in [21,29] the authors consider an infinite time-horizon control problem, which constraints the proposed approach to deal with time-invariant and asymptotically stable systems, while the  ∞ /FTS methodology works over finite-time intervals, allows treatment of linear time-varying systems and, in principle, does not require asymptotic stability of the system under consideration.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, the mixed  ∞ ∕ 1 approach separately optimizes over two different classes of input signals, while the approach considered in our paper performs a double optimization (peak and energy) over the same class of inputs. Moreover, in [21,29] the authors consider an infinite time-horizon control problem, which constraints the proposed approach to deal with time-invariant and asymptotically stable systems, while the  ∞ /FTS methodology works over finite-time intervals, allows treatment of linear time-varying systems and, in principle, does not require asymptotic stability of the system under consideration.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fix ideas and make a comparison between the two methodologies, let us assume that R = Γ in the approach dealt with in this paper; then, roughly speaking, given a signal in scriptL2, the scriptH/FTS approach tries to minimize both the energy and the peak of the corresponding output; conversely the scriptH/scriptL1 technique (see , and, more recently, ) for a given input in scriptL( scriptL2), tries to minimize the peak (energy) of the corresponding output. In other words, the mixed scriptH/scriptL1 approach separately optimizes over two different classes of input signals, while the approach considered in our paper performs a double optimization (peak and energy) over the same class of inputs.…”
Section: State‐feedback Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation