2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10851-006-7251-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-State Auto-Models and Motion Texture Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the video primal sketch model, I Λ 0 may be modeled either by the sparse coding model in (5) or by the FRAME model in (11). The choice is determined via the competition between the two models, i.e., comparing which model gives shorter coding length [33] for representation.…”
Section: Sketchability and Trackability For Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the video primal sketch model, I Λ 0 may be modeled either by the sparse coding model in (5) or by the FRAME model in (11). The choice is determined via the competition between the two models, i.e., comparing which model gives shorter coding length [33] for representation.…”
Section: Sketchability and Trackability For Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasized that this kind of a mask is meaningful only when the camera is static, or camera motion has been compensated for. Thus, in the most general case, it should be derived from the residual motion vectors (the motion measurements remaining after camera motion compensation), as in [17].…”
Section: Kurtosis-based Activity Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRF models until now were developed for either continuous or discrete random variables [6,5]. Conversely, inspired from [9], we are here interested in modelling a energy functional E(x, y), over y ∈ S N , where S is a mixed space defined by S = Ω ∪ R, with R the space of reals and Ω the space of symbolic concepts. The notion of "mixed-state" comes then from the bi-modal nature of the unknown y, either continuous (in R), either symbolic (ω ∈ Ω).…”
Section: Definitions and Fundamentals On Mixed-state Conditional Randmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixed state nature of the random variable compels us to define properly a density function that is associated to it (see [9,10]). Let us first define, for a given element y i , a mixed measure : m(dy i ) = δ ω (dy i ) + λ(dy i ) where δ ω is the Dirac measure at ω ∈ Ω and λ the Lebesgue measure over R. We note δ * ω = 1− δ ω (y i ).…”
Section: Definitions and Fundamentals On Mixed-state Conditional Randmentioning
confidence: 99%