1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf01886327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixture models and atypical values

Abstract: The resolution of a mixture of two or more populations into its component distr~butions may be markedly influenced by one or a few atypical values. The maximum likelihood solution effectively assigns (part of) each observation to one or another of the components via the posterior probabilities, even though the observation may be widely discrepant from all components. This paper presents a modification of the mixture problem, in which the typicality of each observation is considered, as well as the posterior pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common way in which robust fitting of normal mixture models has been undertaken, is by using M-estimates to update the component estimates on the M-step of the EM algorithm, as in McLachlan andBasford (1988) andCampbell (1994). In this case, the updated component means are/~}k+l) are given by (9), but where now the weights u!…”
Section: Previous Work On M-estimation Of Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A common way in which robust fitting of normal mixture models has been undertaken, is by using M-estimates to update the component estimates on the M-step of the EM algorithm, as in McLachlan andBasford (1988) andCampbell (1994). In this case, the updated component means are/~}k+l) are given by (9), but where now the weights u!…”
Section: Previous Work On M-estimation Of Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of providing protection against outliers in multivariate data is a very difficult problem and increases with the difficulty of the dimension of the data (Rocke and Woodruff (1997)). The related problem of making clustering algorithms more robust has received much attention recently as, for example, in McLachlan and Basford (1988, Chapter 3), De Veaux and Kreiger (1990), Campbell (1994, Dav~ and Krishnapuram (1996), Frigui and Krishnapuram (1996), Kharin (1996), and Rousseeuw, Kaufman, and Trauwaert (1996), and Zhuang et al (1996), among others. In the past, there have been many attempts at modifying existing methods of cluster analysis to provide robust clustering procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the Gaussian mixture paradigm, Campbell (1984), McLachlan and Basford (1988), Kharin (1996), and De Veaux and Krieger (1990) achieve a similar effect by using M-estimators (Huber 1964(Huber , 1981 of the means and covariance matrices of the Gaussian components of the mixture model. In a similar vein, Markatou (2000) utilizes a weighted likelihood approach to obtain robust parameter estimates.…”
Section: Robust Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, Campbell (1984) follows this approach to update the components of a Gaussian mixture in the M step of the EM algorithm. In the same spirit, Hennig (2003) uses M-estimation in clusterwise regression, in combination with an iteratively reweighted algorithm with zero weight for the outliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%