1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1003892830838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Snapshot campaigns are considered a valuable tool to identify and interpret the contributions of different sources to streamflow (e.g., Dupas et al, 2019;Salvia et al, 1999;Soulsby et al, 2007;Zimmer & Lautz, 2015), especially during low-flow periods. Our study also showed that snapshot campaigns may reveal local landscape controls on low flows, like inflows from bedrock groundwater or flow through particular layers.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Low-flow Snapshot Campaigns And Future mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Snapshot campaigns are considered a valuable tool to identify and interpret the contributions of different sources to streamflow (e.g., Dupas et al, 2019;Salvia et al, 1999;Soulsby et al, 2007;Zimmer & Lautz, 2015), especially during low-flow periods. Our study also showed that snapshot campaigns may reveal local landscape controls on low flows, like inflows from bedrock groundwater or flow through particular layers.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Low-flow Snapshot Campaigns And Future mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grayson, Gippel, Finlayson, and Hart (1997) used snapshot sampling campaigns to assess the spatial variability of streamwater chemistry during low-flow conditions in a large catchment in southern Australia and identified unknown point source contributions and key in-stream sources of dissolved solutes. Similarly, Salvia, Iffly, Vander Borght, Sary, and Hoffmann (1999) reported the variability in nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations during low flows in a catchment at the border of Belgium and Luxembourg. Snapshot campaigns have also been used to estimate pollutant and contaminant inputs along streams under different flow conditions and to study the effects of agriculture on streamwater chemistry (e.g., Assaad, Pontvianne, & Pons, 2015;Kang, Lin, Gburek, Folmar, & Lowery, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study water quality at this scale, a so-called 'snapshot' or synoptic water quality sampling scheme should be applied. Most snapshot studies have been performed under stable base-flow conditions Webb, 1975, 1978;Grayson et al, 1997;Thornton and Dise, 1998;Gburek and Folmar, 1999;Salvia et al, 1999;Buck et al, 2004, Van der Perk et al, 2007 but rarely under different hydrological conditions (Thornton and Dise, 1998). Probably, it is often not feasible to collect synoptic monitoring or sampling data because of the vast size of the study area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%