<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts /><mml:mrow /><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow /><mml:mrow /></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>C inelastic scattering at 3

Kerr, P. L.; Kemper, K. W.; Green, P.V.; Mohajeri, K.; Myers, E. G.; Schmidt, B.; Hnizdo, V.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.54.1267

Cited by 15 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This same effect was observed in the elastic scattering at 18 MeV of 6 He+ 12 C by Milin et al [23]. Using the adjusted elastic potential parameters, an analysis was performed for the inelastic scattering to the 2 + 4.4 MeV state of 12 C. of inelastic scattering of 12 C+ 6 Li at 30 MeV [46]. The coupling strength is calculated within the simple rotor model.…”

Section: A Elastic Scatteringsupporting

confidence: 57%

Two-neutron transfer reaction mechanisms in $^{12}$C($^6$He,$^{4}$He)$^{14}$C using a realistic three-body $^{6}$He model

Smalley,

Sarazin,

Nunes

et al. 2013

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The reaction mechanisms of the two-neutron transfer reaction 12 C( 6 He, 4 He) have been studied at 30 MeV at the TRIUMF ISAC-II facility using the SHARC charged-particle detector array. Optical potential parameters have been extracted from the analysis of the elastic scattering angular distribution. The new potential has been applied to the study of the transfer angular distribution to the 2 + 2 8.32 MeV state in 14 C, using a realistic 3-body 6 He model and advanced shell model calculations for the carbon structure, allowing to calculate the relative contributions of the simultaneous and sequential two-neutron transfer. The reaction model provides a good description of the 30 MeV data set and shows that the simultaneous process is the dominant transfer mechanism. Sensitivity tests of optical potential parameters show that the final results can be considerably affected by the choice of optical potentials. A reanalysis of data measured previously at 18 MeV however, is not as well described by the same reaction model, suggesting that one needs to include higher order effects in the reaction mechanism.

show abstract

Section: A Elastic Scatteringsupporting

confidence: 57%

Two-neutron transfer reaction mechanisms in $^{12}$C($^6$He,$^{4}$He)$^{14}$C using a realistic three-body $^{6}$He model

Smalley,

Sarazin,

Nunes

et al. 2013

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As noted in several papers, e.g., Refs. [37,48,49], the deformation length for the transition 1 + 1 → 3 + 1 in 6 Li derived from the reduced transition probability B(E2) is much larger than the values obtained in different CC analyses of 6 Li scattering. Figure 8 shows the results of calculations for the 6 Li + 64 Zn system obtained by using the nuclear deformation lengths taken from Ref.…”

Section: Nucleusmentioning

confidence: 55%

“…7 show the results when the couplings to the 64 Zn 3 − 1 excited state and the 7 6 Li, 7 Li, and 64 Zn. (δ λ ij ) expt are "experimental" deformation lengths for 6 Li [37].…”

Section: Coupled-channel Calculationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quasielastic backscattering and barrier distributions for the6,7Li+64Znsystems

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Excitation functions of quasielastic scattering at backward angles were measured for the weakly bound 6 Li and 7 Li projectiles on a 64 Zn target at energies around the Coulomb barrier. The corresponding barrier distributions were derived from the experimental cross sections. The experimental data were analyzed within the coupled-channel model using a double-folding potential as the bare potential. Inelastic excitations of the target, the 7 Li first-excited state, and 6,7 Li resonant state(s), corresponding to sequential breakup, were included in the calculations. The comparison between the data and coupled-channel predictions shows that the effects of channels not included in the calculations, such as direct breakup and transfers, are much larger for 6 Li than for 7 Li.

show abstract

“…The study examines for the first time the NM potential, embodying a repulsive core, on the tensor analyzing powers in the framework of simple OM potential. The T R tensor potential, originally proposed Satchler [24] and tried on the 6 Li + 12 C scattering by Reber et al [22,37] and Kerr et al [23,38], in conjunction with the NM central real, effective SO and imaginary parts of the interaction potential U(R) in equation ( 9), are able to reproduce features in the angular distributions of CS and analyzing power data. In particular, iT 11 , T 21 , T 22 data are well accounted for in OM using normal J-independent imaginary potential.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-section, vector and tensor analyzing powers of the ⁶Li + ¹²C elastic scattering at 30 and 50 MeV: a non-monotonic potential description

Nilima

Hossain

Azad

et al. 2020

J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work reports, for the first time, the analysis of tensor analyzing powers (T 20, T 21, T 22) along with the differential cross-section (CS) and the vector analyzing power iT 11 for the 6Li + 12C elastic scattering at 30 and 50 MeV within the framework of an optical model (OM) using microscopic shallow non-monotonic (NM) potentials. The NM potential is generated from the energy density functional formalism (EDF) (Brueckner et al (1968) Phys. Rev. 168 1184) using a realistic two-nucleon interaction incorporating the Pauli exclusion principle. The shallow NM potential can describe the experimental angular distributions of CS and analyzing powers of the elastic scattering data. The OM analysis of the data at 30 and 50 MeV does not indicate their sensitivity on the nuclear matter incompressibility K.

show abstract

→6+12C inelastic scattering at 3

Cited by 15 publications

References 41 publications

Two-neutron transfer reaction mechanisms in $^{12}$C($^6$He,$^{4}$He)$^{14}$C using a realistic three-body $^{6}$He model

Two-neutron transfer reaction mechanisms in $^{12}$C($^6$He,$^{4}$He)$^{14}$C using a realistic three-body $^{6}$He model

Quasielastic backscattering and barrier distributions for the6,7Li+64Znsystems

Cross-section, vector and tensor analyzing powers of the ⁶Li + ¹²C elastic scattering at 30 and 50 MeV: a non-monotonic potential description

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

→6+12C inelastic scattering at 3

Cited by 15 publications

References 41 publications

Two-neutron transfer reaction mechanisms in $^{12}$C($^6$He,$^{4}$He)$^{14}$C using a realistic three-body $^{6}$He model

Two-neutron transfer reaction mechanisms in $^{12}$C($^6$He,$^{4}$He)$^{14}$C using a realistic three-body $^{6}$He model

Quasielastic backscattering and barrier distributions for the6,7Li+64Znsystems

Cross-section, vector and tensor analyzing powers of the 6Li + 12C elastic scattering at 30 and 50 MeV: a non-monotonic potential description

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Cross-section, vector and tensor analyzing powers of the ⁶Li + ¹²C elastic scattering at 30 and 50 MeV: a non-monotonic potential description