2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.123514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INTEGRALconstraints on primordial black holes and particle dark matter

Abstract: The International Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory (INTEGRAL) satellite has yielded unprecedented measurements of the soft gamma-ray spectrum of our Galaxy. Here we use those measurements to set constraints on dark matter (DM) that decays or annihilates into photons with energies E ≈ 0.02-2 MeV. First, we revisit the constraints on particle DM that decays or annihilates to photon pairs. In particular, for decaying DM, we find that previous limits were overstated by roughly an order of magnitude. Our new, cons… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
115
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(139 reference statements)
9
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SPI/INTEGRAL limits on this line lead to limits on the PBH fraction which are similar to the gamma-ray limit for 10 16 g M PBH 10 17 g [158,159]. There are somewhat tighter constraints (that exclude f PBH = 1 up to M PBH ≈ 2 × 10 17 g) from INTEGRAL measurements of the Galactic diffuse flux in the MeV range [160]. There are also constraints from Super-Kamiokande measurements of the diffuse neutrino background [178].…”
Section: Evaporationmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SPI/INTEGRAL limits on this line lead to limits on the PBH fraction which are similar to the gamma-ray limit for 10 16 g M PBH 10 17 g [158,159]. There are somewhat tighter constraints (that exclude f PBH = 1 up to M PBH ≈ 2 × 10 17 g) from INTEGRAL measurements of the Galactic diffuse flux in the MeV range [160]. There are also constraints from Super-Kamiokande measurements of the diffuse neutrino background [178].…”
Section: Evaporationmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Constraints on the fraction of DM in the form of PBHs f PBH , with mass M PBH , or in the form of compact objects, f CO , with mass M CO for each of the different types of constraint.In each case the excluded regions are shaded. Top left: evaporation constraints on PBHs (section 3.1): extragalactic gamma-ray background[55], CMB[153,154], dwarf Galaxy heating[155], EDGES 21 cm[156], Voyager e ±[157], 511 keV gammaray line[158,159] and the MeV Galactic diffuse flux[160]. Top middle: gravitational lensing constraints on compact objects (section 3.3): stellar microlensing (MACHO[161], EROS[12], OGLE[162], HSC[163]), Icarus lensing event[164], and supernovae magnification distribution[165].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was modeled by an abrupt fall-off in density outside the scale radius r s in Eq. (54). For these subhalos, M = M s where M s is the mass contained inside the radius r s .…”
Section: Nfw Subhalomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lifetime of PBHs with masses less than 2.5 × 10 −19 M ⊙ (3.5 × 10 −19 M ⊙ ) for nonrotating (maximally rotating) black holes is less than the age of the Universe and it cannot contribute to the DM density [51][52][53][54]. The leading constraints on low-mass PBHs arise from the observation of photons [8,55,56], cosmic rays [9], and the 511 keV gamma-ray line [57,58]. Astrophysical observations of neutrinos have been used to constrain particle DM [59,60] and here we study its implications for PBHs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%