1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.33.2132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U234excited states fed in theβdecay ofPa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 plots the calculated configurationconstrained PESs for two-quasiparticle K π = 6 − states in 232 Th, 234 U and 236 Pu, showing octupole deformations or octupole softness. Experiments have observed a K π = 6 − isomer at an excitation energy of 1.42 MeV with T 1/2 = 33.5 µs in 234U [40]. The experimental energy is reproduced by the present calculation giving E x = 1.26 MeV.…”
Section: Calculationssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Figure 2 plots the calculated configurationconstrained PESs for two-quasiparticle K π = 6 − states in 232 Th, 234 U and 236 Pu, showing octupole deformations or octupole softness. Experiments have observed a K π = 6 − isomer at an excitation energy of 1.42 MeV with T 1/2 = 33.5 µs in 234U [40]. The experimental energy is reproduced by the present calculation giving E x = 1.26 MeV.…”
Section: Calculationssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It enabled the derivation of an extended level scheme of 234 U. In comparison with previous investigations in the actinide region, the high efficiency of the MINIBALL γ-ray spectrometer allowed the analysis of coincidence data, which was not feasible in a previous γ−ray measurement (Ardisson et al, 1986). The analysis of the coincidence data allows for several extensions and corrections of the known level scheme of 234 U.…”
Section: Spectroscopy Of 234 Umentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are smaller differences in the mean gamma energies, although within the uncertainties given for the JEF2.2 and JEFF3.11 evaluations and within 3σ for the ENSDF and DDEP evaluations. The DDEP evaluators [23] note that beta − decay scheme is based on a single measurement result [24] which includes 28 unplaced gamma rays, carrying about 3.2% of the total intensity. In addition there is inconsistency between the Q-value determined from evaluated beta − decay radiation and mass differences.…”
Section: M Pa and 234 Pamentioning
confidence: 99%