MNCs, Worker Identity and the Human Rights Gap for Local Managers

Millar, Carla; Choi, Chong Ju

doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1078-4

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hence, “To Be or Not To Be” also invites further research. We need to discuss more explicitly the issue of sub‐national and supra‐national bundles together with “hybrid situations,” where MNCs operate alongside local companies – a challenging new research agenda I have already highlighted in the context of employee rights and responsibilities (Millar & Choi, , ).…”

Section: Conclusion and Further Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

To Be or Not To Be: The Existential Issue for National Governance Bundles

Millar¹

2014

Corporate Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Manuscript Type Conceptual Research Question/Issue The article addresses the issue of whether governance bundles which include both formal and informal governance mechanisms should be classified and compared on the basis of national identity. Research Findings/Insights The governance bundle affecting each firm has formal components which are frequently based on national legislation, but also includes social and moral dimensions, and behavior in words and action that may differ widely within nations and may derive from relationships with firms and communities in other countries or even globally; only the formal component of the governance bundle may be national. The development of governance bundles is a long‐term process that reflects the culture and ethical demands of the societies in which companies operate; formal institutions and laws develop and are respected – or not – in light of how informal governance mechanisms create the behavior in society. The continued existence of a mixture of familiar and different governance mechanisms in emerging markets is throwing doubt on the convergence hypothesis that development will lead all governance to a consistent model. Theoretical/Academic Implications The role of informal institutions – also as substitutes for corporate governance mechanisms – is central to understanding the functioning of corporate governance. Theory needs to consider the individual company and different company types (e.g., size, industry, ownership) in order to illuminate the interaction of formal corporate governance and informal institutions and other forces which constrain the company and those who control it. There needs to be more attention to the issue of sub‐national and supra‐national bundles together with “hybrid situations” where multinational corporations operate alongside local companies. Practitioner/Policy Implications The acceptability of corporate governance regimes depends on implementation at firm level; as there are substantial differences in the informal mechanisms amongst them, which may vary according to factors such as size, industry, ownership, organization or region, policy measures should have the flexibility and sophistication to take account of these.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion and Further Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%