2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-012-0107-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile banking — insights on its increasing relevance and most common drivers of adoption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
61
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
61
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are similar to an earlier review (Ha et al 2012) which acknowledged the preponderance of TAM as an explanatory framework. Ha et al (2012) identify key factors for the adoption of mobile banking as perceived cost, perceived risk, perceived usefulness and perceived compatibility.…”
Section: Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are similar to an earlier review (Ha et al 2012) which acknowledged the preponderance of TAM as an explanatory framework. Ha et al (2012) identify key factors for the adoption of mobile banking as perceived cost, perceived risk, perceived usefulness and perceived compatibility.…”
Section: Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Lu et al (2011) suggest that the perception of cost of mobile payment services exists only in the student group and not among salaried workers. Extending the definition of costs as a determining factor in adoption of mFinance services beyond economic measures, Ha et al (2012) propose that both tangible and intangible costs, such as transaction and switching costs, 3 should be taken into account. Extending the definition of costs as a determining factor in adoption of mFinance services beyond economic measures, Ha et al (2012) propose that both tangible and intangible costs, such as transaction and switching costs, 3 should be taken into account.…”
Section: Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been used in Internet-based technology studies in various areas, such as m-payment and m-banking (Ha et al 2012;Kim et al 2010;Liébana-Cabanillas et al 2014;Schiertz et al 2010;Shin 2009), m-health (Akter et al 2013), Internet banking (Cheng et al 2006), e-services (Featherman et al 2010), m-services (Mallat et al 2009;Zarmpou et al 2012), mobile Internet (Kim et al 2007), and m-commerce (Bhatti 2007;Chong et al 2012;Chan and Chong 2013;Li and Lv 2007;Lu 2014;Wei et al 2009;Wong and Hsu 2008;Wu and Wang 2005;Zhang et al 2012). These studies confirmed the strong influence of perceived usefulness on user acceptance.…”
Section: Perceived Usefulnessmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The best interface is that a user will have all types of access regarding usability and understanding. It enhances the relationship between users and the system (Ha, Canedoli, Baur, & Bick, 2012). So we hypothesized that: H2: User interface has positive influences on mobile banking adoption.…”
Section: User Interface and M-banking Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 99%