2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile phone generated vibrations used to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown both the first and fifth metatarsal heads have the most accurate accuracy for detecting diabetic neuropathy (0.86 and 0.85), respectively, compared to the dominant index finger, patella, lateral malleoli, medial malleoli, and heel. 25 Another study reported, neuropathy examination has good accuracy at the fifth metatarsal heads. 26 Detection of neuropathy in the fifth metatarsal heads at 125 Hz has an accuracy value of 1.06 (1.02-1.09; P = .01).…”
Section: Concurrent Validitymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have shown both the first and fifth metatarsal heads have the most accurate accuracy for detecting diabetic neuropathy (0.86 and 0.85), respectively, compared to the dominant index finger, patella, lateral malleoli, medial malleoli, and heel. 25 Another study reported, neuropathy examination has good accuracy at the fifth metatarsal heads. 26 Detection of neuropathy in the fifth metatarsal heads at 125 Hz has an accuracy value of 1.06 (1.02-1.09; P = .01).…”
Section: Concurrent Validitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Today, a vibration-based cell phone assessment can be used to detect neuropathy. The use of a 128 Hz tuning fork has been reported to have an accuracy ranging from 0.77% 25 to 78.26% 26 and a sensitivity of 0.69. 27 In this study, we report the use of a vibration-based cell phone as a neuropathy test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy of the tuning fork was 0.77, 10 g monofilament was 0.79, and mobile phone accuracy was 0.88. [20] C. Biothesiometer The testing is started with lower limb and upper limb. If a Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) of less than or equal to 50 V was indicated at the first location, no any other location was tested.…”
Section: B Tuning Forkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penelitian sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa vibrasi handphone memiliki akurasi yang baik untuk pemeriksaan neuropati yaitu 0.88 (May et al 2016 (Willits et al 2015), PeriVib (Jacobs et al 2018), Neurotip, garpu tala 128 Hz (Bracewell et al 2012), dan Neuropad (Ponirakis et al 2014. Saat ini telah dilaporkan bahwa vibrasi handphone dapat digunakan untuk mendeteksi neuropati (May et al 2016). Namun belum digunakan di klinis komunitas termasuk pada pasien luka kaki diabetes, dan kelaurga.…”
unclassified