2008
DOI: 10.3233/ica-2008-15106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile robot formation control using a modified leader-follower technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative equations between leader and follower robots are first shown. 16 A distributive control law, called SMI, [15][16][17] is next shown. Furthermore, sonar-equipped mobile robots, Pioneer 1 and Pioneer 2, are briefly explained.…”
Section: Leader-follower Formation Control Using Sonar-equipped Mobile Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relative equations between leader and follower robots are first shown. 16 A distributive control law, called SMI, [15][16][17] is next shown. Furthermore, sonar-equipped mobile robots, Pioneer 1 and Pioneer 2, are briefly explained.…”
Section: Leader-follower Formation Control Using Sonar-equipped Mobile Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al 14 used a potential function to track the velocity of the leader robot. Fujimori et al [15][16][17] proposed a distributed control law called the self-made input (SMI) in which the states of the leader robot are not required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More specifically, we assume to have two additional vehicles, one preceding the tracked AGV, and the second following it, moving at the same (random) speed of the AGV. Obviously, more sophisticated mobility models of the ob- stacles, as those presented in [12], could be considered. The obstacles are slightly wider and longer than the tracked AGV.…”
Section: Impact Of Anchors' Placement and Of Moving Obstaclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the consensus problem for a group of linear systems with nonzero communication delay (i.e., agent-to-agent) has been solved, in separate, by [17,26,20] for the case of zero input delay (i.e., controllerto-plant), and by [14,13] for the case of delayed self-position information (yet, the latter efforts assume that velocity information is non-delayed and, consequently, the controller can inject artificial damping into the system with the aim of stabilizing it). Likewise, the coordination of multiple agents in leaderless and leader-following configurations [10] with communication and input delays has been addressed in [30,19,31,44,47], for systems with single-integrator dynamics, and in [40,39,21,24], for groups of double-integrators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%