2019
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2018.1560175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility in patients with lower limb amputation after prosthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although few kinds of research used SF-36 total scoring, it has been discouraged by both the SF-36 scoring manual as well as developers [25]. SF-36 scores can also be converted into two different components including the Physical mental component (GH, PF, BP and RP) and Mental component summary (SF, VT, RE and MH) but in this study, eight health domains were addressed as recommended by RAND scoring manual: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions [26]. Scores included in each domain was converted in scale i.e., worst (0) to best (100).…”
Section: Measurement Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although few kinds of research used SF-36 total scoring, it has been discouraged by both the SF-36 scoring manual as well as developers [25]. SF-36 scores can also be converted into two different components including the Physical mental component (GH, PF, BP and RP) and Mental component summary (SF, VT, RE and MH) but in this study, eight health domains were addressed as recommended by RAND scoring manual: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions [26]. Scores included in each domain was converted in scale i.e., worst (0) to best (100).…”
Section: Measurement Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of fragility integrated rehabilitation leads to improvements in functional outcomes, mobility, cognition, and overall healthrelated quality of a life. [16][17][18][19][20][21] As per authors' knowledge, this intervention has not been practiced and tested as well as not any other standard rehabilitation protocol on hip fracture among the older adults of Pakistan. Therefore, this study is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of FIRM on the Pakistani adult population after hip fragile fracture surgery.…”
Section: -12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intensive interdisciplinary team approach is thought to be satisfactorily subtle for enhancing the functional outcomes in Sarcopenia patients with hip fracture and is a prognostic predictor for independent ambulation. 19 The quality of life for activities of daily living was measured through the EUR-Q5 dimensions questionnaire, which showed significant improvement in four dimensions except for the anxiety, which was insignificant. In a study conducted among the Korean community regarding the quality of life in elderly patients with hip fracture, reported that level of pain, discomfort, mobility, anxiety, and usual activities were significantly improved in patients receiving FIRM care when assessed 10 th days postoperatively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%