2002
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2002.801403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility increases the capacity of ad hoc wireless networks

Abstract: The capacity of ad hoc wireless networks is constrained by the mutual interference of concurrent transmissions between nodes. We study a model of an ad hoc network where nodes communicate in random source-destination pairs. These nodes are assumed to be mobile. We examine the per-session throughput for applications with loose delay constraints, such that the topology changes over the time-scale of packet delivery. Under this assumption, the per-user throughput can increase dramatically when nodes are mobile ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
835
5
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,114 publications
(859 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
15
835
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This demonstrates that mobility increases the achievable capacity as long as the scheduling discipline is left flexible, which agrees with findings in the context of ad hoc mobile networks (Grossglauser & Tse 2002). However, this does not imply that mobility increases the capacity achieved by a given scheduling discipline, e.g.…”
Section: (I) No Mobilitysupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This demonstrates that mobility increases the achievable capacity as long as the scheduling discipline is left flexible, which agrees with findings in the context of ad hoc mobile networks (Grossglauser & Tse 2002). However, this does not imply that mobility increases the capacity achieved by a given scheduling discipline, e.g.…”
Section: (I) No Mobilitysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This applies not only to fast rate variations but also to mobility that occurs on a slower time scale and creates additional opportunities to serve users in the most favourable locations, which may be interpreted as a form of network-wide opportunistic scheduling. In this regard, the above observation resonates with the fact that mobility increases the capacity of ad hoc mobile networks (Grossglauser & Tse 2002). What is perhaps less obvious is that the performance and capacity improvements also arise in the case of fair sharing, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Frequent topological changes introduce new challenges, including intermittent connectivity and increased data delivery delay. Although mobility requires high management overhead, it offers significant advantages over static WSN such as: energy efficiency [4], improved sensing/radio coverage [5], enhanced information fidelity [6], greater channel capacity [7] and reliable target tracking [8].…”
Section: Fig (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this work, extensive studies have been conducted to achieve a tighter capacity bound [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Franceschetti et al [2] apply percolation theory to obtain a per-node transmission rate higher than 1 ( ) n !…”
Section: W N N !mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Grossglauser and Tse [3] prove that network capacity can be increased with mobility of ad hoc nodes. They show that per-node transmission rate of ( ) W !…”
Section: W N N !mentioning
confidence: 99%