2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-070x(00)00004-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility of older people and their quality of life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
249
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 393 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
249
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Webster et al (2002) cited the ability 'to go where you want to' as one of the main advantages of cars and driving for older people. Metz (2000) refers to the importance of potential travel, which he describes as the knowledge that a trip could be made even if it is not actually undertaken. Independence that travel affords has been well-documented (e.g., Burns 1999Burns et al 2000, but the additional sense of control the car creates is important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Webster et al (2002) cited the ability 'to go where you want to' as one of the main advantages of cars and driving for older people. Metz (2000) refers to the importance of potential travel, which he describes as the knowledge that a trip could be made even if it is not actually undertaken. Independence that travel affords has been well-documented (e.g., Burns 1999Burns et al 2000, but the additional sense of control the car creates is important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies highlight the benefits, including health and well-being, of continued mobility (Metz, 2000(Metz, , 2003Mollenkopf et al, 1997;Mollenkopf et al, 2005;Webber et al, 2010;Yeom et al, 2008). Some studies show that poor transport use can be linked to a reduced health status (Marottoli et al, 2000;Ragland et al, 2005), and this may be worse in developing countries where transport problems are a barrier to older peoples' access to basic social services and participation in local activities (Help the Age International, 2002).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our personal-level covariates indicate the socio-economic status of the respondents (wealth, income, land ownership, and education) and other characteristics (age, migration experience) that have been found to be relevant in previous studies on technology adoption, usage, and mobility (Rogers 2003;Metz 2000). We also experimented with variables that may affect the ease of motorized transport usage (distance to paved and unpaved roads, household altitude, and distance to other households).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%