Mobilizing the Trump Train: Understanding Collective Action in a Political Trolling Community

Abstract

Political trolls initiate online discord not only for the lulz (laughs), but also for ideological reasons, such as promoting their desired political candidates. Political troll groups recently gained spotlight because they were considered central in helping Donald Trump win the 2016 US presidential election, which involved difficult mass mobilizations. Political trolls face unique challenges as they must build their own communities while simultaneously disrupting others. However, little is known about how political trolls mobilize sufficient participation to suddenly become problems for others. We performed a quantitative longitudinal analysis of more than 16 million comments from one of the most popular and disruptive political trolling communities, the subreddit /r/The Donald (T_D). We use T_D as a lens to understand participation and collective action within these deviant spaces. In specific, we first study the characteristics of the most active participants to uncover what might drive their sustained participation. Next, we investigate how these active individuals mobilize their community to action. Through our analysis we uncover that the most active employed distinct discursive strategies to mobilize participation, and deployed technical tools like bots to create a shared identity and sustain engagement. We conclude by providing data-backed design implications for designers of civic media.

Cross-Partisan Discussions on YouTube: Conservatives Talk to Liberals but Liberals Don't Talk to Conservatives

“…This is especially true for direct conversations between people. There is a huge difference between a respectful conversation on the "/r/changemyview" subreddit and having a troll join a conversation with the goal of trying to disrupt or elicit angry reactions (Phillips 2015;Flores-Saviaga, Keegan, and Savage 2018). Bail (2021) (Chapter 9) described an experiment where encounters with others of opposing views were structured to hide some ideological and demographic characteristics; this led to more moderate political views and reduced affective polarization in a survey conducted a week later.…”

A review of the literature on the metaverse: definition, technologies, and user behaviors

“…By integrating this perspective with the above hypotheses, we further assume that technical features directly influence behaviors in the metaverse and that technical features also indirectly influence metaverse-related behaviors through other social elements (e.g. psychological outcomes) (Flores-Saviaga et al. , 2018).…”

Online Trolls: Unaffectionate Psychopaths or Just Lonely Outcasts and Angry Partisans?

“…In that sense, partisanship represents a form of defensive/reactive trolling, even if it sometimes goes beyond mere revenge and represents some form of ideological impetus (Fichman & Sanfilippo, 2016). Driven by certain political beliefs or ideologies, trolls seek to draw attention to the social issues they care about (Sanfilippo et al, 2017), or they use social media as communication and mobilization channels through which to find allies and/or to legitimate and inspire a group action (Flores-Saviaga et al, 2018). Political trolling practices can also include baiting ideological opponents into arguments through coordinated behavior and conscious attack, in order to spam adversary online platforms and individuals (Frischlich et al, 2021;Sanfilippo et al, 2017).…”