2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal properties identification of a novel sandwich footbridge – Comparison of measured dynamic response and FEA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it was presented, developed modelling method of shell and sandwich type structure gave satisfying results -the model was positively validated (see also [8][9]) and after expansion was successfully used to design target composite footbridge [4][5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As it was presented, developed modelling method of shell and sandwich type structure gave satisfying results -the model was positively validated (see also [8][9]) and after expansion was successfully used to design target composite footbridge [4][5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The main aim of the study, was to construct a single span footbridge made only of composite materials as one element in a single technological process [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, attention should be paid to the fact that the isotropic constitutive material modelling of traditional bridge analysis needs to be replaced by orthotropic constitutive material modelling. The finite element (FE) model should be calibrated against the results gathered during field testing of an actual bridge superstructure under dynamic load following the well-established and proved procedure [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, details of the shell model are not described in this paper, because the article is focused mainly on non-destructive testing, application of SHM, and results measured by the used sensor networks. A full description of the shell model, as well as considerations on choice of the appropriate approach to model such a bridge are available in references [33,34] and therefore we do not repeat them here.…”
Section: Description Of the Analyzed Bridge-structural Solution Matementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the vibration monitoring system was still able to identify some natural frequencies of the structure. The natural frequencies analysis were limited to 40 Hz, due to numerical analysis results (see reference [34]), which showed that the basic structural characteristics fall within this range. The Fast Fourier Transform was obtained automatically with its own system continuously analyzing the recorded signal.…”
Section: Ambient Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%