2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode of crustal extension determined by rheological layering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
62
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The spacing between individual shear zones and the width of associated basins results from a dynamic interplay involving the brittle-ductile transition depth in the upper crust (e.g. Vendeville et al 1987), the strength contrast between upper and lower crust (Wijns et al 2005) and the lithospheric necking width. For example, the deeper brittle-ductile transition depth in the thick-lithosphere model at 1 My and 8 My (Fig.…”
Section: Alternative Model Setups and Robustness Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spacing between individual shear zones and the width of associated basins results from a dynamic interplay involving the brittle-ductile transition depth in the upper crust (e.g. Vendeville et al 1987), the strength contrast between upper and lower crust (Wijns et al 2005) and the lithospheric necking width. For example, the deeper brittle-ductile transition depth in the thick-lithosphere model at 1 My and 8 My (Fig.…”
Section: Alternative Model Setups and Robustness Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patterns (or modes) of continental extension primarily depend on the rheological layering of the lithosphere (Analytical models: Buck, 1991;Analogue models: Allemand and Brun, 1991;Brun, 1999;Tirel et al, 2006;Numerical models: Lavier et al, 1999;2000;Tirel et al, 2004a;Wijns et al, 2005;Gessner et al, 2007;Gueydan et al, 2008;Rey et al, 2009a;2009b;Huet et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2015;Wu & Lavier, 2016). For a general appraisal of lithosphere rheology and its effects on large-scale geodynamics see Burov (2007a;2010;.…”
Section: Modes Of Extension As a Function Of Lithosphere Rheologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of perturbations in the initial conditions are used to localize the deformation at model centre such as: fault in the brittle crust (2), low viscosity anomaly in the ductile crust (4), local cohesion loss (2) or local higher cohesion (1) in the brittle layer, thermal anomaly in the lower crust or in the mantle and wedge shape crust. In models with no perturbation (Wijns et al, 2005;Gessner et al, 2007;Tirel et al, 2009) deformation is more distributed leading to the simultaneous development of several core complexes that can interfere during their development (Tirel et al, 2009). In addition, in 11 models a strain weakening function is used in brittle and/or ductile material.…”
Section: Comparison Of With Other Numerical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Formation of these different types has been found to depend on factors such as extension rate, strain softening, thickness of the brittle crust and strength of the ductile crust, and processes associated with extension, as, for example, gravitationally driven deformation, isostasy, magmatism and necking [Buck, 1991;Buck et al, 1999;Benes and Davy, 1996;Lavier et al, 2000;Corti et al, 2003;Lizarralde et al, 2007]. The numerical models of Wijns et al [2005] and Moresi and Mühlhaus [2007] show progressively more distributed faulting in the brittle upper crust (a wide rift mode) for an increase in strength of the ductile lower crust or a decrease in strength of the brittle upper crust. A decreasing fault or necking spacing with increasing substrate strength also results from the instability analyzes of Montési and Zuber [2003] and Fletcher and Hallet [1983].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%