1992
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90266-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode of QT correction for heart rate: Implications for the detection of inhomogeneous repolarization after myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that Bazett's formula overestimates the actual values at short RR intervals, while underestimating them at long RR intervals in humans (see 30 for review) and dogs. 45, 46 Without entering into the remaining controversies regarding which QTc correction to use in which experimental setting, the following should be noted: (1) the Matsunaga formula 32 has been found preferable to Bazett for testing QTc prolongation in beagle dogs and likely other breeds; (2) despite the first point, the QTc prolongation with the Bazett formula in the combined AC1/HCN2 biological pacemaker setting (at cycle lengths < 600 ms) should call for vigilance in evaluating the occurrence of proarrhythmia either spontaneously or induced via electrophysiological testing; (3) the occurrence of QTc prolongation with overexpressed HCN2/AC1 at low cycle lengths, but not with HCN2/AC1 at higher cycle lengths nor with sole overexpression of AC1 or HCN2 points out the complexity of events that may occur when various gene therapies are administered singly versus together in settings where their impact on a physiologic process is being assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that Bazett's formula overestimates the actual values at short RR intervals, while underestimating them at long RR intervals in humans (see 30 for review) and dogs. 45, 46 Without entering into the remaining controversies regarding which QTc correction to use in which experimental setting, the following should be noted: (1) the Matsunaga formula 32 has been found preferable to Bazett for testing QTc prolongation in beagle dogs and likely other breeds; (2) despite the first point, the QTc prolongation with the Bazett formula in the combined AC1/HCN2 biological pacemaker setting (at cycle lengths < 600 ms) should call for vigilance in evaluating the occurrence of proarrhythmia either spontaneously or induced via electrophysiological testing; (3) the occurrence of QTc prolongation with overexpressed HCN2/AC1 at low cycle lengths, but not with HCN2/AC1 at higher cycle lengths nor with sole overexpression of AC1 or HCN2 points out the complexity of events that may occur when various gene therapies are administered singly versus together in settings where their impact on a physiologic process is being assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also known that some of these correction formulae (e.g., Bazett's) yield misleading data, especially when differences in the heart rate between the treatment and control groups are large [16]. Two correction factors described by Todt et al [17] and Van de Water et al [9] have been identified that more adequately correct QT intervals for changes in heart rate. In this study, KUR-1246 at 10 and 100 µg/kg significantly reduced blood pressure with a concomitant increase in heart rate in conscious dogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Aomine, 1989). Although the relationship between cardiac repolarization and cycle length becomes hyperbolic if cycle lengths > 1000 ms are included (Aomine, 1989;Surawicz, 1992), linear regression can be fitted equally well to the relationship if only the range of cycle lengths pertinent to this study are considered (Todt et al, 1992b). …”
Section: Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 96%